Brandon’s Alfa 4C: Inconspicuous Exotic

Brandon Hitchman’s car collection runs the gamut. His affinity for motor vehicles and an innate ability to wrench prompted him to become a buyer and seller even before he got his license. In those formative years, his business dealings put him in touch with some folks who could help him realize some of his racing ambitions.

After linking up with a vintage racer in his hometown, Brandon began attending track days with said racer, who was kind enough to lend him the keys to their Shelby GT350 race car. The two went on to try vintage racing, and from there on, Brandon’s life revolved around racing and fixing cars of different genres, makes, and vintages.

“I always had a soft spot for Italian cars. My first car was an Alfa ‘74 Spyder, actually. I took a break from the Italian stuff to go through my muscle car phase and raise a family, and once the kids were out of the house, I was given a chance to reunite with my past — the 4C was released. The timing couldn’t have been better, really,” he recalled.

Thrilled at the idea of a mid-engine Italian exotic without the price or the attention, he had to start looking at buying one for himself. At the time he was racing Spec Miata, but Brandon was then in his late forties and unsure whether wheel to wheel held any allure for him anymore. “If I’m being honest, I wasn’t the type to ever red mist it. A lot of guys are willing to put it on the line, and I couldn’t see the sense in it any longer,” he admitted.

“I also enjoy the build process, and spec racing does not allow for much creativity. That’s when the idea of doing time trials came along. Let’s be honest: time trials in a Spec Miata aren't that exciting,” he declared. So, he considered his options. He’d already been through his Porsche phase and had grown to find them a little anodyne, and though the newest Supra was a performance bargain he couldn’t deny, he wanted to take a less-traveled path.

So he bought a 4C and was immediately delighted. The turbo response, the theater, the sense of occasion, the shape, and the interior were all wonderful. “It smelled exactly the same as my old Spyder inside — that took me back thirty years,” he said.

Soon after, he began tracking it. The stability of the suspension, the destabilizing shove of the turbo motor, and some of the ergonomics proved themselves less than track-worthy. A pretty performance car, sure, but not exactly one meant to turn fast laps consistently. “I loved its looks, but it comes with a small assortment of problems which keep it from being as functional as I wanted it to be.”

The factory seats are beautiful, gorgeous Sabelts, but they offer the support of a bench seat in a 1980s Bronco,” he began. In their place, he installed a set of seats typically used in another pint-sized machine, the Tillet B5s as used in the Lotus Elise.

Visibility is good, width is good, though for Brandon, whose ape index is quite high, the fore and aft are not great.

Though the aftermarket for this car is somewhat limited, there are a few dedicated advocates who’ve seen the shortcomings in the 4C and made the necessary improvements available for a premium price. Closer inspection reveals a tightly-packed MacPherson rear arrangement — one of the compromises made to make a carbon-tubbed car priced at $80,000.

“It didn’t have the stability to handle the change under load — the dynamic toe-out under braking was an issue,” he added.

Rudi Gale of Gale Motorsports is a Slovenian who dedicates himself to hill climbing and racing his 4C. Though his car doesn’t boast much in the way of power mods, its suspension issues have been addressed, and Brandon followed suit. “I’ve pretty much copied Rudi’s setup because it’s proven and there’s no need to reinvent the wheel. I bought his rear control arms and then his front control arms, which both feature a spherical bearing setup and are much stronger. They also use the same factory attachment points.Now the quality of the rear is more aligned with the dual wishbone front suspension.

Then he installed a set of GMS swaybars specced to run with the Nitron coilovers and the arms, then corner balanced it. “I just started buying more and more suspension stuff — pretty soon it snowballed,” he recalled.

It was in dire need of an aggressive alignment. “The car has no power steering from the factory, but it also has no caster. I think probably Alfa’s engineers wanted it to be this raw sports car, but one of the marketing guys mentioned, “The average buyer of this car is in their fifties, and not many will be able to turn it.” The lack of caster didn’t help the steering self-center, toe-out made it wander.

With all those items addressed, he no longer had to constantly work the brake and the throttle to balance the car. “Everything was well integrated; the damping and the spring rates made it very driveable. It could handle curbs, has a pointy front and a stable rear to complement it.

Now comfortable with the car and pushing harder, Brandon found the 4C would snake slightly under hard braking. Fortunately, Rudi bought a carbon fiber decklid and a wing specifically for the 4C at just that moment — the timing couldn’t have been better.

Of course, this shifted the balance rearwards; forcing him to trail brake more. As luck would have it, Rudi had just released his own 3” splitter to even the aero balance.

The footwork sorted, he shifted his focus to the motor. The emphasis was not on bringing much more power into the picture, but making the stock powerplant more tractable and consistent. It had been heat soaking quite badly — even on the street. By installing a Scara 73 motorsports intercooler, he only experiences minor dropoff towards the end of a mid-summer session at Thunderhill Raceway Park.

“I’d like a little more aero in front with an open hood which the radiator could vent through. Currently, the hood is vented, but the factory radiator setup vents underneath the car,” he noted.

I started from the ground up trying to solve some of those issues. For such a low production car, I was amazed how much aftermarket support there is. Now, it’s not cheap, and I’m buying everything out of Europe — suspension parts from Slovenia and coilovers from England — but I was able to upgrade the car to solve the problems as I went. I tried to do it wisely; I didn’t just throw a bunch of upgrades at it hoping they’d solve my problems; I focused on one issue at a time.

Now, he’s mostly content learning to drive the car at its limits. It’s been rock-solid and repeatable, but traction is an issue, even with only 320 horsepower and 350 lb/ft of torque. “I’ve been struggling to put the power down, so I tried running a gear higher. I only use third and fourth at Thunderhill West, actually, and I short-shift a lot to keep it in the mid-range. I’m getting close to a 1:20 there but I’m still so late to throttle. I figure there has to be a second or so on the table just from that.

Looking back, I realize I could’ve bought a Supra, saved some time and money, and made it much faster than the 4C, but I wanted to do something a little different. No matter how many bits and bobs you throw at a regular car, they don’t make it special. I, for one, like improving a special car, one which nobody is doing much with, and taking it to the next level. Plus, it’s not a car that attracts the wrong kind of attention. I’ve owned Porsches and a Ferrari, and they tend to elicit a negative reaction. The Alfa doesn’t get much hate – no weird feelings at all.”

Sure, it’s got its quirks, but that’s what gives it its charm. The quirks and styling set it apart, and I did what I could to make it more functional. Most importantly, I’ve been able to make it mine and get something more out of it. I see a few good years ahead with this car.

Piers’ 240Z: From First Principles

Piers Hugh Smith recently took to mechanics through cafe racers — a consequence of lockdown boredom while living in London. Underneath his apartment complex, he began spending his spare hours rebuilding a classic motorcycle with the assistance of battery-powered lights and powertools as there were no outlets in the parking lot available to him.

“It was a 1970s Honda CB550 and it was a total wreck. I found it in a commercial waste site. I took the opportunity as a way to learn about rebuilding engines. It was just so simple and light — I could pick it up easily and install just about everything on my own.”

It also set the stage for his later projects by having a motor quite similar to a modern car’s. “Through some forum trawling and badgering a few friends over the phone, I learned my way around its carbureted inline-four and got it into a reasonable state. In fact, I commuted to work in London for about a year on it — a great bike for traffic that’s much smaller than modern bikes with similar displacement.”

Piers educated himself on the essentials of internal combustion and learn his way around an air-cooled four-stroke motor fairly quickly — thanks largely to his obsessive commitment to understanding the fundamentals, and the simple nature of a classic engine.

The smooth, swooping lines of a fastback had always spoken to him and his aesthetic tastes, which, after deciding to try his hand at restoring four-wheeled vehicles, made choosing the titular vehicle easy.

“I remember seeing a 240Z with the Pandem kit years ago while I was in school — it just blended the original curves of the car with something aggressive, but sympathetic to its basic shape. Plus, the fastback has great aftermarket support, so the combination of visual and practical appeal drove me towards modifying one myself.

This one came up for sale as an unfinished project. I was still in the UK at the time, where the car was, and the bodykit had been installed. The owner, a bodywork specialist, was asking a reasonable price since, mechanically speaking, it was a complete mess. The wiring was horrid, the interior was mostly MDF from the DIY store, and the mechanics were in poor state.

I got the car ambitiously; thinking it’d be a quick and easy finish, but it took a year and a half to get it sorted,” he admitted.

Over those eighteen months, he took to this car with the same fervor he had with his cafe racers. There was a plan, however — this was no flight of fancy.

Sympathetic Modernizing at a Reasonable Cost

“The whole idea was to learn how the chassis works and modernize it while preserving the original design intent and spending pragmatically on maximizing the driving experience. I thought about engine swapping the L24 with a BMW B58, but in the interest of preserving the soul of the car, I decided to keep the original engine and keep it carbureted, albeit with some modern updates to make it more usable.

It involved a full rebuild of the engine with partnership of Four Ways Engineering. It’s a basic performance setup with triple Weber DCOE40 carburetors, a bigger aluminum radiator, electric fans, a stainless straight-through exhaust, and a stainless intake. I haven’t yet dynoed it, but people with similar setups make around 180-190 to the wheels. I also converted it to electronic ignition and labored over the wiring by introducing common grounds and independent relays to ensure reliability, then I installed a newer and slightly taller diff from a later automatic 240SX to improve cruising manners and replace the tired original unit.”

The powerplant functional, Piers moved onto the chassis and its lengthy list of to-dos. “I wanted to modernize the handling, first by stiffening the body with some bracing, and then by welding BC BR coilovers to the original spindles and rear hubs.

“You buy a standard weld-in coilover that is the right size for the car, then you weld it to the original front spindle. It’s a generic fit,” he added.

Along with the new shocks, he turned to Silver Project, a Polish company specializing in 240Z suspension components builds, for their adjustable control arms and tension rods given the cost of securing US imported parts in the UK.

In keeping with the classic looks, he decided to updated the interior with some modest street buckets and an aluminum center console from Skillard, an Oregon-based aftermarket specialist, as well as a couple new powdercoated items to maintain a vintage period look inspired by aviation panels of the era.

The car has a weak point in its chassis stiffness; there is a lot to be gained by taking some load out of the original thin steel. Piers made up for this by introducing Apex Engineered triangulated strut braces in the front and rear.

Piers made the move across the Atlantic to San Francisco this January and brought his beloved Z with him, though it lagged behind by six months. Once he’d shipped and registered the car stateside, he made the next bolt move — to track the car. Last weekend’s event at Sonoma was a first for both him and the car he’d spent so long restoring.

A Day of Firsts

“While I didn’t build it for the track, I wanted it to be fun and capable. I drive it to work, to social events, and on backroads, too. I wanted versatility, mainly. That said, it was easy to see how testing the car on track could improve the product, ultimately.

The first day, it was flooding the cylinders with fuel at high revs on the main circuit, so I did a carb sync, changed the fuel ratio and jetting, and then went back out for the third session, where the car had much better power delivery and more predictable behavior. However, with the additional speed, I blew out the brake booster. In every other sense, the car performed really well considering its age as well as my experience as a builder.

Getting to run with my friends in modern cars demonstrated how these older cars are so much more analog; needing a thoughtful approach from the driver. I spent most of my time trying to preserve my momentum because there’s not much power, and it’s only available across a narrow powerband. I can’t just floor it; nothing happens. I need to listen to the car and plan ahead to make sure the car is ready for the next segment as it does not respond well to sudden changes in demand.

Now, through driving the car aggressively, I know that there’s an iterative list of improvements to make, particularly in the suspension and braking realm. It’s got too much dive, and it still has OEM brakes. There are cheap OEM disc-brake setups that bolt in fairly easily with some adapters. I might also add a five-speed box from the 240SX, another bolt-in item, then leave this car alone. It would sound good, stop well, and produce a reasonable amount of power. I think I would be very close to hitting my build objective of a stand out resto-mod which delivers a huge smile to the driver and passenger at a reasonable level of expense.

I’ve not yet spent much time on aero. Given the speed of the car, my goals for the build, and the marginal return of aero modifications, I do not think it offers the best bang for buck at this stage, but is undeniably important and something to consider later on.

The car’s sitting on much wider tires than standard: 9.5 in the front and 10.5 in the rear, and those might be slightly too wide for the power and stiffness. There need to be other changes in the package to support a footprint that size. This was a case of form getting in the way of function rather than sticking true to my original goal: for beauty in their harmony.

I can only say that I was really happy with the event. It was my first-ever track event. Having my friends there was great — to drive alongside them and to have their emotional support when I was spending time under the hood wondering why I didn’t just bring something fuel injected!”

This car, as beautiful and as expensive-looking as it is, was built primarily to teach Piers some of the intricacies of the chassis without costing him a fortune. “With this one, the obvious thing to do is to keep spending time on the setup; I made sure everything’s adjustable as there’s a lot to be learned through making the most of the car as it is before endless upgrades. As long as they worked well enough, I picked mid-tier parts to keep costs reasonable, too.

His second Z car, which he’s just started building, will be built to further his understanding of balancing performance, aesthetics, cost, and usability. “The chassis has already been seam welded and acid dipped with full length frame rails to make the thin monocoque frame a little bit stiffer. They’re not safe cars to begin with, and rather than engineer crumple zones, I will install a six-point cage with removable door braces. I believe that installing a cage is also the best way to stiffen the chassis. The next engine is still an original block, and the intention is to keep it naturally aspirated, but bored and stroked to get more modern levels of power.

There’s a company called Apex Engineering that does a very interesting double wishbone setup for the S30 Z cars in the front and rear. This would be an easy way to achieve more predictable suspension dynamics and a stiffer sub-frame style set up.

In the second car the goal is simple: to take a blank shell from first principles and combine it with what I learned in the first and use it to create a beautiful, analog, and enjoyable high performance sports car whilst staying true to the original design intent of the 240Z.

Now when I’m driving the car, I feel more confident given I understand the basics of how it works, and I think the education the car has given me has made me a more sympathetic driver. There remains a very long way to go, but understanding why the car behaves the way it does has really come from putting it together myself.

I spend most of my day behind a desk, so this is a great distraction from my normal day and focus on creating something immediately tangible — it has this incredibly different feeling to the rest of my time that it makes it easy to become hyper-meticulous. I keep lots of notes, so when I go down a rabbit hole on one dimension of the build, I don’t lose that learning when I actually come to implementation later on.

I remember my design teacher in high school giving me advice to sleep with a notebook on my bedside table for those wee-hour solutions — I’m glad I listened. I try to be pragmatic about what I do and don’t do, which is why I picked a readily available, well-developed car, and I try and focus on tackling areas of the build where I can be additive, rather than re-creating a solution just so I can say I did it from scratch. All of this I think maximizes learning rather than just bolting bits together.”

Bennet’s C8: Driver Mod Comes First

Bennet Kao learned quickly that the Tesla Model 3 was a capable track car with the right technique. By capitalizing on its strengths — surprisingly capable brakes and its torque and traction advantages — he could stop the car in a short distance, sacrifice the mid-corner, and prioritize a strong exit to lengthen any subsequent straight.

Good traction and a favorable weight distribution make the electric heavyweight a serious contender on the track, but it’s not without its issues. The problem is the Model 3 is only good for about two hot laps before it starts to limp. Since Bennet recognized that driving skill came before a long mod list, he prioritized seat time. Posting only eight to ten laps per track day didn’t exactly constitute time well spent, so he decided to make a change to a car which weighed less than two tons.

“I figured the gen-two BRZ was the perfect segue,” he recalled. “I wanted to learn to carry momentum and drive a manual, and since this was rear-drive, I wasn’t comfortable with having too much power at first.”

He sent his new toy to TDW Auto in San Jose for their advice and mechanical expertise; having them install a pair of Stoptech big brakes, Racecomp Tarmac 2 coilovers, and a set of Kumho V730s. With how playful the car was from factory, these were the only modifications they felt were necessary.

Transitioning into a lighter, nimbler, and less powerful car was not easy; after setting times at 2:02 at Buttonwillow 13CW and 1:27 at Thunderhill West, he had to ask himself what wasn’t working. Thankfully, he had a few friends with similar setups who offered him some help. Seigo Ma, another gen-two BRZ owner, offered Bennet his passenger seat and fielded a few questions.

“I tried to focus on the exit with the Tesla. I also braked pretty late and hard with the Tesla, but I couldn’t do that in the BRZ; it would just oversteer too much. I looked at Seigo’s data and realized he was braking a little softer and a little earlier, but released the brake earlier, carried more mid-corner speed, and got back to throttle earlier. His inputs were gentler. That way, he could keep the car settled more of the time.”

Following an adjustment period working at finding more rolling speed, he started feeling himself. “I never spun that car, and I spun everything else I’d owned. It is the most forgiving car I’ve owned — you could make coffee while you corrected the oversteer,” he joked.

He whittled his Buttonwillow 13CW time down to a 1:58 and felt pleased with himself. That glow lasted until, after two dozen track days in the BRZ, he lost fourth gear. That prompted him to start looking for a replacement. “I missed the mid-engine feeling of the Tesla, but I did not miss the weight.”

Browsing an auction site one Monday afternoon, he came across a C8 Corvette with a few enticing modifications. A Brembo BM6 big brake kit and a set of four–way KW V5 coilovers would make it possible to get back to track driving that much sooner. He placed a bid, crossed his fingers, then turned off his computer and picked up his kids from school.

The following morning, he learned he’d placed the winning bid.

At Buttonwillow a month later, he left his first DE in the C8 with mixed feelings. While the car had the directness that he’d been missing, it felt like it was going to kill him half the time. “There was so much weight in the rear and the spring rates were way too soft. I kinda hated it,” he admitted. Additionally, the power steering pump seemed to struggle in high-load corners. “Going into Riverside, the steering assistance would sometimes work intermittently. I guess the pump struggles with the forces there.” Lastly, the motor would pull some power once the intake temperatures reached 230 degrees. “I could get about five hot laps a session at full power that day, but it was pretty warm.

While it wasn’t a stellar shakedown, Bennet kept his head up by maintaining his driving-first approach to driving, he recognized that his technique, even more than his setup’s shortcomings, was to blame for his unsatisfying first track experience in the C8. “I studied a few YouTube videos from other mid or rear-engine drivers and made some changes. I began to understand that this layout was not as forgiving as an FR, which meant my steering rate had to be a lot slower, and I couldn’t trailbrake as assertively as I did with FR cars. It just needed to be balanced more delicately.”

Refining his inputs helped him dial in the turn in more consistently and, crucially, settle the rear end. After all, such an incisive front end was what he’d been longing for, and with the ability to put down power much earlier than the BRZ ever could, he began to love MR driving dynamics.

With his technique honed to his car’s liking, he looked to improve the suspension for track work while keeping the car streetable. The KW V5’s default spring rate was 7kg/7kg, and while that split’s higher than stock Z51’s 4kg/5kg, it was too soft for track usage; resulting in excessive nose dive under hard braking and a lazy rear end during transitions. While researching popular spring rates for track-oriented C8s, he found that C8 Z06/Z07 has a stiffer front relative to the rear, which would help him get a flatter, better stabilized platform.

With a 14kg/10kg arrangement, as well as a bit more rebound at the rear, the C8’s setup is now neutral with a touch of oversteer. That said, having almost 60% of the weight in the rear aids in traction zones, and he’s been able to apply the throttle very early. Even with the wheels spinning, it still generates good propulsion.

Even more impressive than his ability to jump from platform to platform and adapt rapidly, Bennet wisely avoided going down the modification rabbit hole. “There’s so much to gain from focusing on the driver mod. I don’t think I’m a naturally talented driver, but I like to do my research and I studied a lot of the fast guys from Speed SF. They coached me with their onboard videos.”

One such driver claimed that the 991.2 GT3 RS was worth three times the C8 Corvette. To challenge this claim, Bennet handed his keys to the man. That was Joe McGuigan.

After returning from setting a 1:34 lap, Joe changed his tune a little.

“With the way you have it set up, it’s one of the best mid engine cars I’ve driven,” he began, “except for the brake pads — they don’t bite or modulate well,” he said. Bennet has since replaced those XP8 pads with Endless ME20.

For the foreseeable future, Bennet hopes to get as much seat time as possible — and as a father of three, all under five years of age, it’ll be hard to find the time. He’s got his work cut out for him, but his technique-forward approach should serve him well in the medium term. Maybe, once his schedule frees up and he’s learned all there is to learn from his C8’s current configuration, he’ll spring for aero, or level up and grab the Z06.

Fan’s NC Miata: Truncating Ten Years

Pursuing a PHD prevents a serious student from doing much else, both for temporal and financial reasons. Fan You recognized the limitations he was under while going for another degree, but had already committed to finding a way realizing his newly-realized ambition of running track days. 

“I had no idea they existed before I moved to San Francisco in 2021,” he said. 

In his typical investigative fashion, he began researching what paths people took to getting acquainted with track driving techniques and how to best practice. For the amount of money he had available at the time, the simulator made the most sense. 

“I read and asked around, and realized the fidelity of modern simulator equipment is very good and would help me learn the techniques of driving.

After driving the simulator, I enjoyed it as a standalone and, even if I never actually raced on a track, I saw it as a good investment. My friends and I started a team, Drag-On Racing, and I dedicated nearly 1,000 hours to the simulator in the first 18 months of ownership.”

That analytical approach shaped his four-step process designed to sharpen his sword in the shortest time possible. 

All his sim preparation was put to the test on his first day of real-world track driving. This, the second step in his plan, depended on two changes: an acceptance of his limitations and disposable income.

A new job allowed him to buy his first track car: a Hyundai Veloster N, a “perfect beginner’s car” which he left untouched. “I was impressed with the suspension, the brakes, and the balance. The transmission was also quite responsive — some call it the ‘Korean PDK.’”

“Based on the research I did, I thought that starting track driving in an automatic front wheel-drive car would be safest to begin track driving; I was not sure I could deal with a RWD’s tendency towards oversteer.”

After a few DEs with his new acquisition, Fan started to probe. “I played with tire pressures and the rear sway bar to make the car a little more playful.”

That calculated sort of curiosity turned out to bolster his confidence in a way he hadn’t anticipated. “Turned out correcting oversteer is easier in real life. When you have the sensations from the car telling you before it begins to slide; you don’t have to rely completely on your vision.”

That was his first impression. As it happened, the tendency to oversteer caused by these setup changes, combined with his growing confidence, nearly cost him big. “It got away from me in Sonoma’s Turn 10, but I just barely saved it. Without my simulator preparation, I would’ve totaled the car,” he admitted. 

The third step in his process was again facilitated by a bump in income. As part of acquiring a rear-drive car with a manual transmission, a platform he felt comfortable with only after his front-drive introduction, he had to wait for a reasonable time to make a purchase. 

As all his prudence would’ve guaranteed, a big win in a poker game helped him secure the funds to pick up a cheap track toy. His deep-pocketed indifference even kept him from looking underneath the car before buying, but, fortunately, he found a mint example of a 2014 Mazda MX-5 Club package. As he would learn, the car was not stock. 

“It’s a shame more people don’t seriously track the NC. It is the redheaded stepchild in the Miata family but for me, it’s a cheap, reliable, and fun platform,” he said. 

Before he could have it inspected, he had to admit to his own shortcomings: he couldn’t drive a stick well enough to bring it home from the dealership. They transported it to him the next day. 

Over the following month, he found slow streets and cul de sacs to practice all he’d learned from his YouTube research. His shifting skills weren’t world class, but by the end of two weeks, he’d been able to coordinate his inputs well enough to make it from stoplight to stoplight. 

Then Gary Yeung at Elite Performance looked underneath and relayed tale of buried treasure. “It actually came with Ohlins DFVs and Whiteline Swaybars. “A nice bonus,” he said. “I’d watched Gary drive his Mango S2000 before and realized he was a very good driver as well as a very good mechanic, so I left all future work on my car in his and Melody’s hands after that. Elite Performance is a great shop and deserves more recognition.”

Following its post-purchase inspection, Fan ordered a Hard Dog rollbar and a set of Hawk DTC-60 pads, as well as a set of 225-section Nankang CR-S tires. During his first event in the Miata, a damp day at Laguna Seca, he remained cautious due to the way a shower the night before left a few rivers running across the track. 

The conditions and Fan’s unfamiliarity with an h-pattern gearbox were his greatest hindrances that day, but despite running the full track in fourth gear alone, he snagged an impressive 1:51.2. Relative to some of the full-out benchmark laps, Fan felt he wasn’t far off his potential performance. “That made me recognize the car’s potential,” he said. 

At Gary’s recommendation, he went ahead and prepped it for pushing harder with a small selection of modifications. With a better Hawk DTC 70/60 split, 17x10” Apex VS5-RS wheels wrapped in 255-section RE71RS tires, a Goodwin Racing radiator, and a camber kit, the MX-5 was ready for Fan’s second attempt at the famous Monterey circuit.

Favorable conditions and improved contact patch helped him snag a 1:48.2 at Laguna — with his AIM goading him on with an optimal time of a 1:47.0 — a time that put the S5 record in his sights. 

After an encouraging demonstration at Sonoma, he returned to Laguna Seca to log his current best of a 1:45.29, even with a silly mistake in T2 that robbed him of half a second. 

If he can find a cool morning free from traffic and commit more to Turns 6 and 8, he’s confident he’ll claim something in the high-44s. “It’s a matter of bravery; the car is more than capable at this stage.”

When he reaches the limits of current setup, he’ll start his fourth step: increasing power, improving aerodynamics, and reducing weight. “With these modifications, a sub 1:40 lap might be possible, but it’s too early to say conclusively.”

The rapid progression from novice to aspiring record-breaker can’t be attributed to anything other than two things: his two-thousand hours of sim driving accrued over the last few years and, of course, his need to realize his current setup’s potential. The main motivation behind my four-step plan was to train myself to be a well-rounded driver, capable of both manual and automatic, both FWD and RWD, with and without power, with and without aero. Actually, the reason for more power isn't to go faster, but to improve my throttle control.”

It was Fan’s analytical powers and prudent planning that helped him acquire the experience that would typically take ten years in just three. “From my research, I could tell that the important thing was seat time. If you want to be good at driving, you need to drive more than twenty events a year, which is already a lot for me — this is the main advantage of the simulator.”

If Fan’s been able to prove anything by truncating ten years, it’s the value of simulated seat time. Go get a rig – it’s one of the few ways you might make a return on your racing investment. 

Abdul’s E46 M3: Checking All Boxes

A competitive driver, totally dedicated to improving his skillset in the shortest time possible benefits from two distinct things: a dependable car and guidance from experienced mechanics.

“I wanted to be able to adapt to different cars quickly, so I tried most of the usual suspects that first year,” he recalled.

Abdul Osmani recognized that there were about a half-dozen well-trodden paths into high-performance driving after sampling the vehicles during his track day foray. Some platforms aren’t as well supported, as as a brief fling with a GT350 taught him, and there’s a good reason for this. “The Mustang taught me a lot about the problems with modern cars: they’re heavy, they chew up tires, and sometimes parts are hard to come by. I realized quickly that lightweight was the way to go.”

In order to advance at his desried rate, he had to conform and buy a proven platform. This realization pushed him towards an S2000, and it also helped him recognize the one other impediment to his success: his limitations as a mechanic.

So, in the name of expedience, he decided to turn to RCrew for their help. They provided him with a prepped track car and allowed him to apply himself to his new craft without distractions. The S2000’s sharp responses would help him improve, but RCrew’s support ensured his ass was glued to that Recaro seat — and nothing would do more for his advancement than practice.

COVID was starting to dwindle by this point, and now with a largely sorted car that could take the track abuse, he logged as many laps as some professional drivers do in a similar timespan. “I had the means to dedicate myself then, so between 2021 and 2022, I completed 41 track days.”

He’d made the major strides towards his ten-thousand hours and built the muscle memory needed to move into competitive motorsport, and setting fast laps began to lose a little bit of its luster. He decided that the next step was endurance racing, for which the Honda was not as well suited to as were some other popular platforms, he realized.

As the popular HPDE options go, there aren’t many cars with the peak grip and pointiness of the S2000, which makes it a serious contender when pursuing PBs. However, due to its low torque, he had to consider an alternative of a similar vintage.

“As fun as it was to set my fast laps, the chess match of enduros was a new challenge I needed; honing my racecraft would be more rewarding, I believed.”

The E46 M3 was the versatile, if slightly compromised, vehicle that would make a successful and similarly streamlined transition into longer races probably. “There were a few reasons why I thought that. For one, the M3’s easier to drive thanks to more torque and better ABS, and the parts are widely available. Plus, it’s eligible for a few different classes with just a tune. I knew this platform would make it easier to accrue the race laps I was after.”

Once he could commit to a plan, he discussed his options with RCrew, who took his provided chassis and whipped it into racing shape in four months. Part of the reason they could proceed so quickly was because, like with Jacek’s rock-solid E46, they used their tested and proven track car package, albeit with a few extras.

“We went with MCS two-way remotes, AP 5000R Pro brakes at both ends, a TC Design cage, RCrew headers and exhaust, a Bimmerworld rear wing, an RCrew splitter, Volk TE37 wheels: the off-the-shelf RCrew starter pack,” he laughed. “On top of the usual parts, we jumped straight into sphericals, a carbon roof, fiberglass doors, and an AIM dash.”

Weighing in at 2,750 pounds with half a tank of fuel and producing 310 horsepower makes the M3 the perfect middleweight that, as mentioned earlier, can run in a number of classes with as little as a change in engine calibration. It might not have the same degree of mid-corner grip or the turn-in immediacy as the car which it replaced, but the package is better suited to long-distance speed, net-net.

But in full time trials trim, the package still puts down sensational single laps. On a set of Hoosier R7s, Abdul’s 1:34.57 at Laguna Seca is remarkable — especially since he acknowledges that he made a few mistakes that lap. The mid-corner understeer in Turns 3, 4, and 9 “might’ve been caused by being a little impatient on the throttle.”

Furthermore, he’s convinced the slicks might benefit from a little more than the 3.8 and 3.0 degrees of negative camber he’s running at the front and rear axle, respectively. Along with a slightly torquier brake compound — he’s been running enduro pads — the turn-in phase might be shortened, which in combination with more mid-corner grip, might help him find another second.

“I didn’t think 1:33s were possible before this lap, but now, if my stars align…” he hinted.

The salient point is that the car is almost completely sorted, and its dependability has helped him get to the point where he’s able to isolate the smallest setup problems and focus completely on his driving.

This stoutness, plus its kindness to its consumables, has made him convinced that there isn’t another option for someone in his position. “It’s funny that this twenty-year-old car is one of the most sensible options nowadays,” he declared.

His performance in Speed SF’s inaugural enduro endorses this statement. After finishing third, he’s committed to the entirety of next year’s season. “I found the 2.5 hour-length perfect. In comparison to my experiences with longer enduros, the 2.5-hour format makes logistics and planning simple and cost effective. It’s almost like a really long advanced DE session,” he said.

Abdul’s had a few things helping him move efficiently and expediently towards his racing goals over the last four years. Not only has he had the good sense to recognize where his strengths lie — identifying a motivating objective, making the necessary lateral moves, and dedicating himself to the cause, while having the means and the connections to get the sort of help that saves him from headaches. Since advancement has been the aim, and the specific outcome has changed slightly with time, he’s had to think about his approach constantly. Not having to worry about picking the right parts or leaving stones unturned has freed up the bandwidth needed to keep adapting to an ever-changing environment.

Cody’s C6 Z06: Father-Son Duo Builds Best Of Both Worlds

Being a GM development driver comes with a few perks. In addition to the privilege of getting flown around the world to test interesting new machines, one of the less obvious pros to this line of work is being able to cement a relationship with your father when he decides to turn his Corvette into a special sort of track toy.

Cody Bulkley’s education and career facilitated the development of his dad’s C6 Z06 — a project ten years in the making. His background has helped him from being swayed by forumthink, as the idea of a clubsport build isn’t always encouraged by the armchair authorities. Some claim that the best of both worlds just can’t be attained and, in actual fact, any attempt will result in something that performs poorly on street and track. Cody thought otherwise.

In his mind, a reasonably modern car can be versatile enough to drive three-hundred miles to a track, compete with caged cars, and drive home in relative comfort, but it’s not an easy balance to strike. It takes a special sort of patience and technical insight to arrive at this compromise.

During his five years in a dual bachelor’s program at the Oregon Institute of Technology, Cody joined the school’s FSAE program, which later led him towards a role in the performance end of the automotive industry. General Motors hired him as a chassis integration engineer and he joined the team that developed the C8 Corvette. Concurrently, his dad picked up the Z06 with the intention of turning it into a serious track toy. With all Cody had gleaned from his job, he had to get involved.

“The easy answer to building a track car is to throw a set of Penskes, a cage, and full aero at the car and call it a day, but we couldn’t do that. Dad drives the car to work regularly, so we had to make it more than a back-breaking trailered car.”

While that was a tall order with a relatively spartan and simplistic performance car, the C6 Z06 has good bones, and proved to be much more versatile than he had originally believed.

The first order of business, as his father requested, was increasing power, which was followed by the attendant challenges of cooling a hot-rodded powertrain. A big cam, a ported intake manifold, upgraded trunion rockers, bronze guides, race lifters, ported and polished heads, and long tube headers added another two hundred horsepower to the tally.

To enjoy some 700 horsepower on hot days, the father-son duo had to labor over the cooling package. After plenty of deliberation, the two installed a GSpeed dual oil cooler, Spal fans, a C&R radiator with the GSpeed C7 fan kit, and an LG Motorsports vented hood. Along with engine coolers, they added a GSpeed power steering cooler and a Turn One power steering pump.

The dual-wishbone setup needs little to make it work well with wide tires and a good deal of lateral load.

To keep the car civilized enough for stoplight-to-stoplight driving, they pulled a few OEM products from the Vette parts catalog, including a C6 ZR1’s torque tube, a C7 ZR1’s clutch and mated them to an RPM-built transmission, which has proven capable of handling the power.

Its 600 lb-ft of torque and 7,100-rpm redline would make a 4,000-pound vehicle feel frighteningly fast, but this Z06 weights in at 3,150 pounds without driver. Not many can outgun this car on straighter sections, but many modern cars could make better use of the power — at least before Cody went to work on the suspension.

The combination of stock suspension and big power left Cody with no leeway. Its sudden breakaway made it difficult to attack faster corners, and when the road surface varied much, it didn’t inspire confidence. Along with the optimized spring rates for their LG coilovers and the GM T1 bars at their softest settings, they installed a Wavetrac torsen-style differential. “That diff made all the difference. It made it possible to finesse the throttle. We found a second with that one modification alone, easily. All these touches have made it progressive in the power-down phase, and that’s why I’ve been able to find most of its time in the high-speed sections.”

Subtle aero mods helps this car slip under the radar while encouraging faith at higher speeds.

It has to be said that, despite its stockish silhouette, the aerodynamics have been massaged, though only a little. Nevertheless, the resulting improvement of the center of pressure helped improve the car’s performance in faster sections. “Originally, it was a little aero-loose,” Cody began, “but we moved its pivot point rearward with a rear wing, wickers, and a big front splitter for balance.”

Thankfully — and making the finer points of this process is due to Cody’s education — the improvement in stability didn’t come with any detriment to livability. “We’ve kept all the factory rubber to keep it semi-civilized,” Cody said.

“We had to replace the front and rear brakes with a set of AP Racing six and four-piston brakes, respectively, but they last a long time. OK, we have to pay the Corvette tax in tires, but we’re able to stretch a set of Supercar 3Rs through four or five weekends.”

That combination of moderate weight and mega power has produced lap times that modern supercars and a few full-on race cars might struggle to meet, as seen below:

Not to add insult to injury, but the current lap times don’t tell the whole story. Cody’s personal best at Laguna Seca was set with a failing clutch, and his best at Thunderhill was set on a 90-degree day. When all their stars align, the Corvette may run a couple seconds faster at the featured tracks.

And this very car was driven to and from the track. Cody’s dad even takes it on work trips to Washington State every blue moon, and it still hurts feelings. “As I said, it’s not easy to find that balance between street and track, but we’ve been able to compete with plenty of caged race cars in what is truly a street car. As we incrementally improve the car, we are aiming at setting several class records across West Coast time attack organizations,” Cody concluded.

I'd like to give a big thanks to Roger, Jamie, and Gary for helping me tear down and rebuild the car over the last decade. Couldn’t have done it without you guys.

Speed SF’s First Enduro Goes Off Without a Hitch

Endurance racing is the next step for many HPDE drivers who want to try their hand at wheel-to-wheel racing. The long sessions, the greater emphasis on strategy, and the ability to share a car make it easier to find a seat, generally speaking. We recognized that some of our talented HPDE drivers, some of whom already have been racing in other long-distance series, might be willing to take the leap into a new style of enduro if we helped them stick the landing.

So we brought our most experienced drivers together to brainstorm. After several months of revisiting various rulebooks and taking a look at the greater range of driving experience we had among our regulars, we devised a plan for an accommodating, competitive endurance format that would not break the bank. Endurance racing can be very expensive, but it doesn’t have to be.

Our loose rules are meant to be easily understood, keep barriers to entry low, and welcome a wide range of driving talent and vehicle performance. Tire choices, horsepower, and weight are all left open. Tires are open as well, as long as they’ll last a 2.5-hour race. There isn’t a restriction on driver count, either — some brave souls can run solo if they choose to.

The one mandatory pit stop is timed at seven minutes. We want to make sure the teams have plenty of time to safely refuel and remain hydrated. It also evens out the playing field; the high budget teams can’t take advantage of a fast refilling system and the low budget teams behind.

As for the regulations, we allow vehicles that pass the safety standards of NASA, SCCA, Lucky Dog, and other major endurance racing series. The vehicle will need to pass our safety tech inspection.

Drivers are required to hold a race license from another approved organization, though we can make exceptions. For drivers without a racing license, as with LeMons, Lucky Dog, and Chump Car drivers; we require they have experience in wheel-to-wheel racing or advanced open-passing run groups with Speed SF track day events. Essentially, they must have a long-standing record showing they are capable of racing in close proximity to others.

The classing is easy and straightforward. It’s based only on the car’s capabilities and the drivers’ performance during the event.

Whatever the time set in qualifying must be adhered to in the race. Essentially, that time cannot be beaten by an established delta or a penalty will be issued. The first infraction will incur a drive-through penalty; the second, a two-minute hold in the pits; the third, a five-minute hold; and the fourth, disqualification. We can also force the team to change class, depending on how much faster their race pace is. Sandbagging is something we hope to avoid.

Last weekend, we put these plans to the test at Thunderhill Raceway Park.After collecting the qualifying lap times from our 21 different cars that day, we established the parameters that would determine which team would run in which class.

Class A: 1:55 - 1:59

Class B: 2:00 - 2:05

Class C: 2:06+

The drivers on the cusp then decided whether to push their car to race in the faster class or dial back to race in the slower group — to push for total dominance or take the conservative approach. Strategy (as well as reliability and consistency) is what decides an endurance race, and our drivers were forced to make a choice that morning.

We started our race at 8 AM, the coolest time of the day, as we wanted to reduce the effects of heat on both drivers and vehicles. Many drivers appreciated that.

Class A and overall winner Daniel Rose had competed in many sprint races in NASA before this, but only a few endurance races. He had his worries about running an enduro, since they aren’t always the best organized, but that wasn’t the case here.

“Speed SF has always been a good host for the track day events, and I’m happy I did it because the enduro was really well organized; everyone knew what they needed to do. Sometimes things can get a little hectic with these kinds of races, but everything was well explained to the drivers that morning.

The classes were split just right — the competition at the front was intense and I had to stay sharp since I was running solo. Thankfully, my car ran well the whole race and went without a single hiccup, but I made one mistake — I drove over some oil in T3 and went into the dirt, but nothing major. Still, with how close it was until the end, I had no idea where that mistake put me. We pitted at the right time, I kept consistent with my lap times, I put my head down, and we came out on top. Group A win and first overall!”

“As far as I heard from everyone else in the paddock, everyone was happy with the class sorting,” Rose added.

Coming in second in Class A were Maxwell Lisovsky and Nate Hackman, who put the plan together at the very last minute. “Maxwell called me on his way down from The Ridge. He needed a co-driver. I’d never driven the car before,” Nate said. He wasn’t filled with confidence, but he took the opportunity.

The two met at Thunderhill and crossed their fingers. Max’s TT2-spec E36 wasn’t built to endurance specs, so he had to sort out a few things during qualifying.

Nate, with fifteen minutes to get a feel for a car he’d never driven before, jumped in and put the car on pole with a time of 1:54. With such a strong start, he decided to start the race and battled door-to-door through four consecutive corners over the first lap to take the lead.

“I really didn’t want to blow the motor in the first stint, so I short-shifted the whole time,” Nate admitted — a sensible approach to getting a time attack car to last 2.5 hours. Even leaving the car in fifth gear for half of the lap, he could set consecutive lap times in the 1:55s.

With a healthy lead, Nate made the mistake of beating his qualifying pace in the race — excusable considering his inexperience with the car — and had to serve a five-second penalty. While in the pits, Daniel snuck by and held onto the lead.

Considering the fact Maxwell and Nate had “no real plans, no communication, and no execution,” as the latter put it, their performance deserves a tip of the hat. Turns out the “send it and pray” approach, even with a time attack car, can yield impressive results in a medium-length race.

Abdul Osmani, a regular Lucky Dog endurance racer and the only solo driver on the Class A podium, also challenged Daniel through much of the race. “I found the 2.5 hour-length perfect. In comparison to my experiences with longer enduros, the 2.5-hour format makes logistics and planning simple and cost effective. It’s almost like a really long advanced DE session,” he said.

Joe McGuigan, regular endurance racer and Speed SF Challenge winner, used the enduro to shake down his newly acquired E46 M3 and get an idea of its fuel burn rate. As his co-driver Don signed on for twenty laps tops, Joe felt he’d leave some on the table, run in Class B, and use the track time to identify any possible problems with his new car.

The M3 had pace, though, and Joe beat Speed SF favorites Gary Yeung and Yunni Zhai to the win by a lap. The M3 proved more economical than he’d planned, so he finished his two hour-long stints with a few gallons left in the tank. The fact that he was able to run an endurance race without having to spend more money to buy a high-capacity fuel cell is just another way this medium-length race lowers the barriers to entry; a fully-built endurance car isn’t necessary for a race of this length.

At 10:30 that morning, the checkered flag flew and we could breathe a sigh of relief — our first endurance race was a success. A total of 21 cars entered and 19 finished. Considering the heat that weekend, not to mention the added strain of a medium-length race, that finishing rate speaks highly of our drivers and their level of preparation.

We’re in the middle of planning next year’s season of endurance racing. but waiting on confirmation from our regular tracks before we publish what we hope will be a very busy 2025 calendar. In the meantime, we’ll be using the race data from this event to create better classing rules that will accommodate an even wider range of drivers and vehicles.

Seeing our dedicated drivers take the next step into racing and proving themselves in a new environment makes planning these events worth the extra effort.

Class A Winners:

1st Daniel Rose BMW E46

2nd Maxwell Lisovsky / Nate Hackman BMW E46

3rd Abdul Osmani BMW E46

Class B Winners:

1st Joe McGuigan / Don BMW E46

2nd Gary Yeung / Yunni Zhai Nissan 350z

3rd Nicolas Voordeckers Funduro Speedster

Class C Winners:

1st Michael McColligan Honda Civic

2nd David Vodden Honda Civic

3rd Becky / Niki Arsham Honda Civic

Results

Brian’s Mustang: Keep It in the Family

Brian Navarra comes from good stock. His dad is a vintage racer with a penchant for Mustangs and he’s also the kind, trusting type, which is why he handed Brian the keys to his 67’ GT350 race car one seminal afternoon at Sonoma Raceway many years ago — back when it was known as Infineon.

“I probably wouldn’t have let my kid drive that car,” Brian said, laughing.

Fast forward a few years, and Brian had built his own ’66 Coupe into a no-frills track car. He quickly learned that his single-purpose car was on par with a few nicely sorted modern machines — so why build something so uncompromising and harsh if there wasn’t any speed to be gained from it? That was the thinking then, anyways.

Rather than spend months undoing all the unpleasant track-oriented modifications that worsened it as a street car, he decided to buy another ’66 and build a dual-duty track toy. Again, that was the plan, but having made a few more friends in the business and eager to try some new ideas, he ended up building another single-purpose machine without air conditioning.

However, he took this one much further in several key areas.

“It’s just on from 4,500 to 8,500,” Brian exclaimed.

At first, he aimed to race the car in a wheel-to-wheel setting, probably NASA American Iron Extreme. But as that class has fizzled into nothing over the last ten years, time trials caught his attention as it would be the most accommodating for an all-out build of this nature.

Taking his cue from the old IMSA GT Mustangs from the 1980s, he tubed the front end and added about as much structural support he could manage. “The number and size of the subframe reinforcements make the whole thing a lot like a box frame.”

It wasn’t just the IMSA cars’ rigidity which he tried to copy, but the motor as well. Back further in the body than the factory motor ever sat, Brian stuck an ex-NASCAR motor. Pieced together a Yates 358 with 13:1 compression.

Although the bottom end is basic small block architecture, it has race heads, port injection, and an Emtron KV8 ECU tuned by Nick Pavloski of Cohesion Motorsport to make a tick under 600 horsepower over a broad powerband.

To keep the powerplant lubricated once the anticipated suspension and tire upgrades were in place, he installed a five-stage Raceline dry sump system with an enormous NASCAR-grade Peterson tank.

It puts that power to the pavement via an HGT six-speed sequential and 335-section Hoosier A7s. Power application is impressive — in no small part improved by the three-link rear end. The full floater Ford 9” housing and DPI Platinum Torsen with 4.22 gears aid in turning traction into propulsion, too, provided Navarra rolls on the throttle out of slower corners somewhat cautiously.

Custom in-house 304 stainless stepped piping incorporates an oval x-pipe underneath the car and Borla XR1 mufflers.

The solid rear axle’s disappointing performance over curbs can be overlooked easily since its straightline performance is so strong. Plus, with the additions he’s made to the rear, he can adjust the rear over a fairly wide range to get the car to suit most settings well. “I added a Watts Link because it’s very tunable for longitudinal and lateral grip. If you’re able to make enough changes at the track, it’s easy enough to work around the solid axle’s shortcomings.”

To fit the 18x12.5” Signature wheels, Brian’s had to stretch the rear fenders to comfortably fit massive tire and wheel package. He ended up building his own front fenders with Eddie Venancio and an English wheel, which was wide enough to drape over his custom double wishbone front suspension.

Brian styled his suspension setup after a variety of race cars he’d studied over the years. “I had a pretty good idea of what I wanted. I still spent some time plotting the mounting points, but fabbing the arms and the uprights was easy enough."

Some things he decided to rely on a bigger company for. “I decided to go with a pre-made spindle from CorteX Racing because it was proven.”

AJ Hartman aero helps its high-speed stability.

For steering, he opted for Sweet Manufacturing’s power steering rack, then added double-adjustable JRi shocks at all four corners with weight jacker perches. Getting the balance right, despite having a hair too much heft over the front axle, was a priority. In fact, he moved the motor back towards the firewall by several inches. Now, his footwell’s noticeably hot by the third lap.

A MoTeC C125 dash and PDM keyboard conveys all necessary info.

Weighing just 3,150 pounds with driver, it has the legs on many cars at faster flowing tracks with (mostly) clean surfaces, but it still struggles administering power at Buttonwillow, say. The aero is admittedly a work in progress, with the completely unsealed front end, homemade splitter and airdam generating little downforce. AJ Hartman rear wing.

He plans for another engine with newer generation Yates parts and a promised 800 horsepower. It’s also somewhat lighter than the motor which currently sits in the Mustang by a notable eighty-five pounds, which should help him with his weight distribution aims. It’s sitting fifty-fifty at the moment, but if shifting the center of mass rearwards like a touring car’s might make all the difference with 33% more power. The more power you make, the more advantageous it is to have additional weight over the driven axle.

The short-term goals are refining the aero package, reducing weight, and continuing to tune the car to suit the driver. Long-term goals are bringing this rough but remarkably advanced Mustang up to carshow-standard levels polish and presentation. “I was kinda shocked when I brought it to Gridlife and realized how ratty it looks.”

No matter. He’s been focused on the right stuff for now. Paint and air conditioning can come later.

Forced Induction For Track Work: Supercharging Two Popular Platforms

Among E46 M3 and S2000 owners, power is almost considered a four-letter word. The majority of those who regularly lap these cars, for reasons of simplicity and cost, prefer to optimize their car’s handling and braking performance in pursuit of impressive lap times. Also, they typically pride themselves, though usually tacitly, on their ability to lap quickly without a big motor to lean on. However, the ratio of grip to power usually falls in favor of the former with most of these builds, which forces the builder to consider whether a significant bump in grunt is worth the time, expense, and possible hassle.

Two of our fastest drivers decided the relatively cost-effective path of forced induction to determine if more power makes a worthwhile difference with these two popular HPDE platforms.

Seigo Ma had been swooning over the videos of the Arvou S2000, a lightweight AP1 using an HKS supercharger to make a touch more than 400 horsepower. The already capable package could exploit that power bump well enough to lap the technical Tsukuba circuit in a remarkable 53.887 seconds.

Seigo wanted to double his engine’s output, but worried that the famously fragile platform wouldn’t be able to handle it. So, in an attempt to get some much-needed encouragement (and see F1 in person), Seigo took a trip to Tokyo. Three days in, he visited Arvou to consult with Mr. Shibata, who encouraged him to take the plunge.

Back in San Francisco, Seigo started speccing his own HKS kit. He did his homework and chose the option of the smaller pulley needed to make 400+ horsepower. After he installed the kit, he sent his car to Blacktrax for the first pass at tuning his Hondata Pro ECU. They were able to make a knock-limited 350 horsepower at the wheels available over a very narrow powerband. “It only revved to 7,000 safely. That lowered redline, the shorter AP2 gearing, and 4.3 final drive made it a challenge to drive; it required constant shifting.”

To make the most of his new kit, Seigo ordered a higher flow fuel pump, 1050cc injectors, colder spark plugs, and a surge tank with an integrated fuel pressure regulator — all the items needed to run E85 safely. A retune of the Hondata brought power up to a knock-free 420 horsepower available at 8,500 rpm. “Power delivery was like a stock F22, but with a lot more at the top end,” Seigo said.

Even with 285-section rear tires and an OS Giken differential to help meter out that power, the bump in grunt was challenging to manage. “Second gear was pretty much useless,” he added. It also proved too much for the factory gearbox; breaking fifth gear broke on his second track day at that power level. To get himself back on track, he picked up a used AP1 box and a larger supercharger pulley to drop boost and lower the power output.

Relocating the oil cooler made lowered temps enough to run full sessions on moderately warm days.

The AP1 box’s longer gearing combined with the lowered output — about 360 horsepower — helped Seigo get to grips with the car at his next outing. Usable power, strong traction, and drastically improved top speeds has helped him keep up with higher horsepower cars that previously left him in the dust. Before braking for Thunderhill East’s Turn 1, he was traveling at 133 miles per hour — roughly 15 miles an hour faster than he ever had before.

The only notable issue with the car were creeping supercharger oil temps, which he resolved by relocating the supercharger’s oil cooler under the right headlight. With that upgrade, the car has been mostly reliable.

On moderately warm days, the car can run full sessions without issue. Only on the hottest days does it begin to falter, but it still works well enough to run three consecutive laps before engine oil temperatures get too high.

A drawback of running E85 is that combined with the new powerplant, it gets quite thirsty. “I burn half a tank per session, so I’ve gotta bring a few jugs of e85 with me every day. It’s still cheaper than running 91 octane and is much safer for the engine though.”

For Christian Fernandez, power was the last box to be ticked after aero, weight reduction, and a solid suspension setup. He’d already set impressive times with his E85-fed E46 M3, but he wondered if there might be an easy solution to extract a little more from his S54.

Dan from RCrew, Christian’s dependable mechanic, made him an offer on an ESS supercharger kit which promised easy power and little-to-no hassle.

As Christian had already installed a larger pump and 550cc injectors in preparation for corn juice, there wouldn’t be much more he’d need for a successful install.

“Multiple YouTubers who’d used the same kit complained of overheating issues, though. The front-mounted intercooler wasn’t necessary with this entry-level kit, so I decided to take the band-aid solution and install a water injection kit to keep intake temps low.”

On a Dynojet, HTE Performance tuned the stock ECU to handle six pounds of boost from the the supercharged S54 put down 487 horsepower — 157 more than what the atmospheric, E85-fed motor had made on the same dyno.

The bump in power is felt largely at the top of the rev range; making the motor feel similarly linear in its delivery, but notably faster at the end of straights. “It’s pretty easy to put the power down, but the extra 3-4 miles an hour it nets at the end of the straights forces me to reconsider my braking points.”

This bump in straightline speed doesn’t overwhelm the current cooling system, which consists of a larger radiator, an oil cooler, and the water injector. “Even on 80° days, the needle never moves past the ¾ mark!

That said, I’m not sure I’m getting all that peak power over a whole session. It probably needs an intercooler.”

The blower hasn’t made maintenance a nightmare, but it has exposed a few leaks that weren’t an issue before. Running a leakdown test revealed a leak from the valve cover seal and around the aftermarket injectors, which never seat properly and require a washer for passable fitment.

Both drivers are content with their new engine setups, which have proven to be reliable after the little issues were addressed. Seigo bought a usable 150 horsepower and 2.5 seconds at his regular tracks. “So far, it’s been money well spent,” he said.

Christian is content with the improvement, though the M3 was never lacking power in the way the S2000 was. To be fair, the former has gone a step further in addressing all their supercharger’s shortcomings, while the latter has taken a more relaxed approach.

There’s still more to be done before the bare-basic ESS kit offers track-worthy performance, but once it’s sorted, there’s no reason it shouldn’t have that funny effect of shortening straightaways — so much so that Christian will have to start thinking of braking point right after he starts to accelerate.

Speed SF Goes Karting: A Thank You to our Coaches

Photo credit: Rachael Hairston Photography

Speed SF’s tiring schedule relies on the enthusiastic support of volunteers, and in an attempt to thank our most dedicated instructors for their time and energy this past season, we decided we’d sponsor them in a special kind of race that gave back to the community.

Miles Kodama, Nate Hackman, and Matt Misencik put in an incredible number of hours this past year, and when asked if they’d be interested in participating in a karting event at Sonoma Raceway, they agreed without hesitation. For all but Nate, this would be their first time racing on Sonoma’s one-mile outdoor karting track.

They’d also get to feel like charitable citizens while they got their jollies. The Sonoma Raceway chapter of Speedway Children’s Charities (SCC) organized the Karting for a Cause event, which donated its proceeds to local children and families in need. Since 2001, the Sonoma chapter has distributed more than $6.8 million to qualified Sonoma County youth groups.

But being good Samaritans was only a small perk in comparison to the pleasure of driving alongside old friends at a top-tier venue in the Saturday sunshine.

Sonoma Raceway’s karting center had recently upgraded their rental kart fleet with new Tony Kart-stickered machines. These nine-horsepower karts weren’t exactly groundbreaking in terms of straightline performance, but being brand new, they generated enough grip to make hustling them on hard tires a bit of a workout in the June heat.

While the standard of kart used that day was nothing new to them, the track was. Sonoma’s outdoor track has been a draw for karters across the nation for the past twenty-odd years. Not only is it set in scenic surroundings; overlooking the full road course below, it remains one of the best designed kart courses in California. The one-mile track mixes technical sections and quick sweepers would make even slightly slow karts very exciting.

The format for the day played a large part in the lighthearted and unpredictable feel of the afternoon. Progression through the day’s six events, each lasting eight laps, was decided by elimination; the fastest four of every seven or eight-person grid would make it to the next race.

From the start, it was clear that Miles, Matt, and Nate had the talent to put them at the front, but despite most of the competitors there not having the same sort of skill, establishing the grid and kart choice through lottery kept things fresh, fun, and challenging. They’d have their hands full making their way through the pack after starting at the rear.

Miles took silver in the first event, Matt won the second, and Nate dominated the third. By the fourth, enough of the field had been eliminated to put the Speed SF drivers toe-to-toe. Matt’s talent for finding grip and managing slow-speed technical sections helped him pull ahead of Miles; the two finishing 1-2 in the fourth event. Nate won the fifth event outright, and for the final race, all three Speed SF drivers were gridded up along with the one threat to their dominance: a young stock car driver who’d flown in from North Carolina.

With the win on the line, the four forgot about driving like gentlemen and began stripping the karts of their new stickers. Unfortunately, the rising stock car driver pulled the mechanic-confirmed fastest kart in the fleet, so the Speed SF trio had their work cut out for them.

Matt started first, followed by Nate, their one adversary, and then Miles. Nate believed Matt would sail off into the distance as he’s proven himself capable of in the past, but Nate found his way past and put his head down to try and stretch a gap. With the stock car star following in his blind spot and taking every low-probability attempt, Nate had to get his elbows out himself to hold his spot. As the two continued to make contact in Man Maker, the course’s fastest corner, Nate decided he wasn’t going to let himself get pushed off and decided to go for broke.

In Man Maker, Nate had been edging towards taking it flat the entire day. On the penultimate lap of the final event, he finally found the confidence to try it. His Hail Mary attempt was matched by the NASCAR hopeful and the two touched at the exit of the corner. Fortunately for our 2023 Challenge S4 vice champion, his rival fared far worse and took a trip into the dirt, giving Nate the chance to stretch a lead over the final lap.

In the end, the Speed SF team came out on top: Nate, Matt, and Miles finishing first, third, and fourth, respectively. After a thrilling day with close racing and near-perfect weather, a trip to the top step of the podium was the icing on the cake. There would be no celebratory champagne on the rostrum, but they’d get a few glasses of grape juice soon afterwards.

After setting their new hardware aside, they relocated to dining space overlooking Turn 3, where they sat around white tablecloths and enjoyed a three-course luncheon with wine pairings from select local vineyards. If they didn’t feel like high rollers then, the view of the stock cars qualifying just feet away for the following day’s NASCAR race did.

Our instructors are the backbone of this business and their efforts have not gone unappreciated. We’re thankful for these three and all the others who spend their Sunday mornings driving to the track when they could be sleeping in, and for their long hours and considerable effort, treating them to a race and a meal was the least we could do.

Cory’s C6 Grand Sport: Safe Not Sorry

He’d spent several years finding his feet in a Mustang, but after his friend was kind enough to let him try their Corvette Z06 at a track day, Cory Smetzler knew he had reached a junction, and although it would cost more, the prudent thing to do was to take a left turn.

The C6’s shape stimulated his imagination, and the performance was already so much more than what he’d been accustomed to; the Z06 in near-stock trim could already outperform his highly-modded Mustang. It was clear that it was time for a major change.

But Cory is a practical person, and making an expensive shift could not be justified by the C6’s soft, curving lines and wide arches alone. Pretty as it was, it was the performance package which convinced him to shell out some more coin, since its improved weight distribution, roomier wheel wells, and dead-reliable engine package promised much more fun and fewer headaches.

A set of American Racing headers bumps output to 470 horsepower and 470 lb-ft of torque at the wheels.

And pragmatism kept him from buying the same model, too. Instead of taking a chance with the Z06’s LS7 motor and its propensity to swallow a valve, he instead opted for the mid-tier Grand Sport, which loses the special motor and the aluminum frame. In their place, the Grand Sport comes with a more pedestrian LS3 and a steel frame, but for the price of less power and more weight, Cory purchased peace of mind.

Though the LS3 isn’t quite the motorsports-grade product the LS7 is, the improvements already made to this particular motor helped Cory forget about lost potential. The previous owner had installed a Dewitts radiator, a FAST 102 mm intake, a Nick Williams throttle body, as well as Doug Rippie Motorsports differential and transmission coolers.

The powerplant ran smoothly in the sweltering summer heat, though the engine lacked that zing and top-end that the other Corvette had, the mid-range torque of the mildly tuned LS3 was plenty exciting.

Mated to a TR6060 six-speed transaxle, the torquey LS3 and its 400-odd horsepower could get the car to GT3RS-speeds surprisingly quickly, so Cory wasted no time giving his new track car the stopping power and safety modifications that it warranted. He doled out the big bucks for an AP Racing Essex front brakes with 372mm rotors and inch-thick pads which guaranteed stopping power, consistency, and long pad life. No sense in taking shortcuts when stopping a heavy, powerful car.

Its accessible mid-range torque is exploitable on shorter courses and still strong enough to reach similar top speeds on faster ones. Surprisingly, the wonderful spread with the right combination of wheel size and final drive make it effortless to keep the engine humming along without the need for many shifts. This is a large part of what makes it so effective at tight tracks.

A 3,300-pound Corvette shows its shortcomings on tighter tracks. The poor motion ratio of the rear leaf springs pushed Cory to double the rear spring rate, which allows for the car to break away more progressively, and the resulting confidence from this predictable sliding helps Cory drive the car with more slip angle than he has with any other car.

The willingness to push a tail-happy car hard in the butt-clenching corners takes more than just progressive breakaway. Cory added a Nine Lives Racing single-element rear wing, mounts, endplates, front tunnels, and a homemade birch splitter added the stability he needed to trust the Corvette in fourth-gear sections at faster tracks like Sonoma.

The current setup isn’t perfect, but it’s nearly there. There’s the matter of weight to deal with, and he’d still like the rear to be better settled, but it is reliable and relatively kind to its tires, and so he’s been able to put in plenty of hassle-free track miles without going through too much rubber. Low maintenance and lots of seat time has been his credo since the start, and he’s hired Joe McGuigan to help put his philosophy to good use. With a little coaching, he’s been putting down impressive times after just a couple visits to Sonoma.

Since his recent move from the Pacific Northwest to Southern Oregon, Cory’s been able to enjoy the temperate weather and make it to track days with more energy and regularity. Seeing as how he’s been able to set impressive laps at circuits that are new to him, it’s certain he’ll be a force to be reckoned with in our Challenge series very soon. We’re happy to have him.

Alex’s FL5 Type R: Best of Both Worlds

For Alex Peysakhovich, living in NYC had its perks, but easy access to track days was not one of them. When he relocated to Los Altos and found himself with a backyard and a garage, he decided it might be time to purchase that car he’d always wanted and take advantage of California’s temperate weather and multiple tracks within a few hours’ driving distance.

His heart was always with Honda, but the then-current FK8 Type R was too boy-racer for his liking. “I really loved the car, but thought about some things you have to do with your only car, like go to a business meeting or drive in a funeral procession, and I couldn’t really imagine doing those in an FK8.”

So instead he began tracking with an ND Miata. Heavy modification made it a capable cornering machine, but its impracticality became a constant pain; it needed a trailer for long drives and couldn’t be used to take his dog and his girlfriend on weekend trips. He thought about getting an electric daily that he wouldn't track or modify, but that idea didn't last long. “What’s the point of buying a car you’re never going to take to the race track?” he asked himself.

Enter the FL5 Civic Type R, which debuted after a couple years of tracking the Mazda. The new Civic traded its predecessor’s divisive looks for more subdued styling, so Alex had to check it out for himself.

“I used to think Type Rs were a little overhyped, but after seeing it in person, I recognized why the car has a cult following,” he said.

He appreciated the way Honda’s engineers made this fifty-grand Civic feel unmistakably upmarket. But more than presence or build quality, it had real-world usability going for it. On longer trips, the comfortable seats were a welcome upgrade from his Miata’s race buckets. The interior space, the fit and finish, and the performance made the FL5 a great candidate for a daily driver-come-sleeper, and once the premiums started to shrink, Alex pulled the trigger and brought one home.

Before his first track outing, he made a few adjustments. He’d learned enough to know that a ~3,200 pound front-driver would wreck its Pilot Sports fairly fast, so he ditched those for a set of 265-section Bridgestone Potenza RE-71RS tires wrapped around Apex VS5-RS wheels. Along with a set of eccentric lower ball joints to increase negative camber at the front axle, he replaced the stock pads with a set of Ferodo DS3.12s to help clamp the factory two-piece rotors.

He broke it in over 600 miles then took it to Thunderhill West for its shakedown, where he was pleasantly surprised. The steering was quick, despite a dead spot at twelve o’clock, and the gearbox was, well, Honda. If the interfaces were lacking in any way, it was the position of the throttle — as he put it, “in another zip code.” Thankfully, the auto-blip function facilitated heel-toe shifts despite the awkward pedal placement.

Being a front-drive car, he had expectations for how it might handle on a damp morning. Those were dashed on his first fast lap after mounting the dorito at Turn 3, when it hung the rear out in a big way.

“As far as a car that can pack a weekend of camping gear and do great times around Laguna, it’s a hard car to beat.”

The FL5’s mechanical LSD and brake-based stability control system do a commendable job getting the middleweight to rotate. What was less than impressive were the thermal problems which have been associated with the turbocharged Type Rs. Though not catastrophic, the heat causes the motor to pull timing by the end of a long session, but never puts it into limp mode. “I think there’s only so much you can expect from a turbocharged two-liter making over 300 horsepower,” Alex added.

Fortunately, these issues are not new to the Type R lineup and the FL5 was designed to make them easier to address than its predecessor ever allowed. The ducting routes have been established from the factory, along with a functional hood vent. Honda laid the groundwork, but more needs to be done for hot summer days. “It isn’t imperative, but it could use a bigger radiator and an oil cooler. I’ve got those sitting in my garage in anticipation for the summer.”

“The designers cared about the experience of the car; they wanted it to feel special, even when parked.” Alex added. Credit: Tokumeigakarinoaoshima CCA-SA 4.0.

Beyond that, any remaining mods are far from necessary. The FL5 is well-balanced out of the box and does not need much more power. “The engine is certainly strong. If it could use something to make it feel a little sportier, it would be an exhaust — it’s too quiet.”

That subdued exhaust note is part of what makes the car so versatile, and its wide repertoire comes at a premium. Besides requiring pricier fuel, the turbocharged front-driver is hard on its front brakes and tires, and it goes through consumables far faster than a lighter, better balanced car like a Miata.

There’s no denying the running costs are too high to track a Type R regularly — multiple track days per month will continue to be the Miata’s job — but the Civic will be doing daily driving, mountains, longer trips, and rear its head at Laguna and Thunderhill East a few times a year.

Four years ago, Alex thought fifty thousand for a Civic was steep, but he’s changed his tune as of late. “I know that sort of money for a Civic sounds crazy, but you really need to try it. It’s tough to think of something similarly priced that handles so many different tasks as well as the Type R. If I could only have one car, this would be it.”

Gordon’s M2: Iteration Cycle

After beginning HPDE during an Apple track day at Thunderhill East, Gordon Mak found a new outlet for his workplace frustrations and his analytical habits.

The Golf R he got his start with proved to be impractical, and practicality being a criteria he’s used to pick his collection of track cars, it didn’t last too long. The Golf’s nannies intervened too much to get closely acquainted with, as the instructor sitting alongside Gordon mentioned several times.

That instructor also encouraged Gordon to look in the right direction, squeeze the throttle with caution, and soften his steering inputs as much as possible. That coach did Gordon an enormous favor that day by instilling good habits in a firm yet friendly fashion. On his drive home, he had a moment to ponder the afternoon’s teachings. Gordon recognized that his new hobby would require two things: a communicative car and the right skillset needed to exploit its full potential.

By the next spring, Gordon was presented with a chance to buy a first-gen BRZ for invoice. The rawness and urgency of a lightweight, balanced car had him hooked, and the first big spin at The Andretti Hairpin had him shook. “Oversteer was a new concept to me,” he said.

Rather than remain intimidated, he tried to suss out his shortcomings then and there. In analyzing his onboard footage following that track day, Gordon could clearly see how ill-equipped he was to deal with the situation. “I just froze; my hands didn’t move at all,” he admitted. 

While some told him it wasn’t the prudent thing to do at that stage, Gordon took a leap and bought an even tail-happier car in the middle of the pandemic. The price was right, and the on-tap torque from a twin-scroll turbo motor and short wheelbase made the GR Supra a lively, exhilarating car with which he could develop his car control skills.

From then on, he committed to the invaluable skid experience of Drift SF, where he could hold long slides, connect corners, and spin without any consequence. “It was sanctioned parking lot hoonery — low credit score activity — that helped me make my first big steps as a driver. By the second event, it all clicked for me,” he said.

“I have to thank Joe McGuigan for teaching me how to slide the car with confidence. Once you move past the pit-in-stomach feeling of losing traction and the belief that you’ll be unable to respond, you can get a lot done. Without all the drift practice, I wouldn’t have felt confident enough to keep pushing,” he explained. 

As fun as it was, the Supra lacked the directness of the GT86. When the dealership he bought the Supra from offered to buy it back for the same price he paid a year prior, he didn’t hesitate. Without waiting, he replaced it with a GR86 and ran eighteen successful events over the next eighteen months.  

The unfiltered driving experience he’d missed so much during his Supra ownership had returned, but not without some adjustment. “After I switched to the GR86, I found myself - for a few events, initially - making unnecessary steering corrections because I had built up so much muscle memory from the Supra always going sideways. It took me a surprisingly long time to get over it, he explained. But even after altering his technique, there was one potential issue he couldn’t get his mind off of. “The ever-present possibility of losing an engine made it difficult to enjoy the car.”

Finding a suitable replacement was simpler at this stage, since Gordon had determined precisely what he was looking for in a track car. He wanted something dependable enough to run full sessions at Thunderhill in the middle of July, something that had adequate performance out of the box, and something which would carry a spare set of wheels and a couple suitcases if needed. Essentially, it had to be mostly turnkey and, if necessary, require only minimal modification. 

Two drivers helped motivate his decision to buy a new M2. First, Randy Pobst’s hot laps in a particular stock car at Laguna, when compared to the PBs set by amateurs in heavily-modded examples of the same model, helped Gordon recognize how big a factor driving skill truly was.

Jackie Ding, the other pro responsible for his decision, had demonstrated what the new M2 was capable of in mostly stock form. While he was worried he might have another Supra experience ahead of him, he took the gamble and sold his GR86 for a brand new M2 in Zandvoort Blue.

Since he recognized the value of seat time, he had less interest in modifying the car heavily than some of his peers. “I’m less concerned with lap times now,” he began. “I’d rather have a few modifications to help me feel calm and confident in the car, but I don’t really have a mod-itch to scratch. I’m more interested in the activities which help me improve as a driver, both on and off the track. If I have an itch to scratch, it’s an itch for self-improvement.”

That said, there’s still some room to make a heavyset grand tourer more at-home on the track, and if he can make a modification or two that will save him in consumable costs, why not? With Millway front camber plates, CSG CP pads, SRF brake fluid, and a square set of Apex VS5-RS wheels measuring 19x10”, he had all he needed to run track days comfortably while keeping his tire bill reasonable. 

The two issues with the car, besides its unignorable mass, are that it’s slightly under-tired and the ZF8 gearbox leaves a little to be desired. “I went a little too conservative with my wheel choice, possibly. It’s even tail-happier than before; I can drift the car in fourth and fifth gear now!” he laughed. 

Some of that is due to the ZF8’s short gearing and the way it shifts somewhat harshly. “It’s easy to spin and lock the wheels on even a slightly damp track.” It’s a lairy sort of car that’s constantly on the verge of oversteer, but at least slide correction is no longer a foreign concept — it’s now something he does without thinking.

Gordon still has some plans for the M2 in the future, but as it’s been happy to run coolly on the hottest days, transport him to and from the track in comfort, and make his track days a little less stressful that the rest’s, he’s content with it as it currently sits. His heart still pulls him towards something lighter and more visceral, but the M2 is about as good a streetable track toy gets. 

And that practical package makes it easier to pursue his main aim, which is to interact with the track community, get enough seat time, and hone his craft as a driver. The fact that the M2 is well insulated helps him hear his coach’s feedback from the driver seat is an added bonus. 

“If you really listen to your instructor, you will improve. I try to remain open minded, test the suggestions coaches and friends give me, and analyze the results. If I can get into an iteration cycle with whomever I’m working with, I’m confident I can find an effective solution to any problem pretty quickly,” he added.

Gordon’s story is one which demonstrates the value of analysis, and, necessarily, the importance of the human element. Rather than descending down the rabbit hole of buying parts to find speed (and justify the costs), he took a different path. He’s searched for the answer to his particular problems and found a repeatable process to keep him active, happy, and stimulated. That’s not something that can be found trawling the forums for an answer.

Richard’s MR2 Turbo: Not Too Pretty To Pirouette

It began all the way back in grade school with Gran Turismo. A few years later, Richard Tran graduated from video games and started moving through the worlds of hard-parking BMWs and drag racing until his expanding network brought a few road racers into his life.

When they invited him to a track day with Speed SF in 2019, he accepted — but not before considering the consequences. Richard was opposed to taking big risks; he’d seriously hurt himself in a car crash a few years before, and he certainly didn’t want to damage his then-new M3, but they persisted — they told him he’d leave the the track feeling something extraordinary.

The feelings of euphoria following that first session helped him forget about the potential costs of thrill seeking. In fact, he’d been bitten badly enough to sign up then and there for another twelve track days. Quickly, he put the dependable M3 on the back burner; he had a cheaper, lighter, more maneuverable mid-engined car he believed would take more to master.

To the trained eye, his 1991 Toyota MR2 Turbo (SW20) didn’t look like the ideal track toy candidate. Actually, it looked more like a museum piece. Three-stage paint, fresh interior panels, and completely new suspension components were all parts of a three-year restoration that culminated in a show-grade vehicle. Richard was so proud of it, he displayed it at SEMA.

Work Meisters and the OEM kouki aero was all that was needed to make the SW20 pop — it truly is a svelte, sexy car.

Despite its immaculate condition, he felt it wasn’t too good to be used in the way he’d (ab)used his M3. In fact, Richard felt that he’d be missing out on something vital if he didn’t track it. There was a directness and a demanding quality about it that made him feel giddy at 5/10ths.

The second outing proved he had his head screwed on straight, but didn’t quite have the quick hands needed to manage the MR2. The factory components just wouldn’t cut it, especially on all-seasons, so he replaced the rotors with slotted Stoptechs and slapped on a set of EBC Yellows. Along with those, he installed a set of Tein Super Street coilovers, a pair of GReddy side skirts, and a 1998-spec spoiler with lifted risers for a little flash.

The basic package was fun, but far from friendly. “I made the mistake of trying to drive it like the M3,” he began, “and that just wouldn’t work. I learned pretty quickly that I couldn’t throw it around or brake as late as I could in the BMW.”

The odd agricultural excursion didn’t dampen his enthusiasm for his demanding new car.

After many red flags and several stern conversations with the track workers, Richard learned he had to soften his inputs a little and improve the chassis a lot. The second-generation MR2 is known as a nervous car prone to rotate without much provocation, but it can be tamed with some suspension work, a little maintenance throttle, and the right sort of staggered tire setup.

Giving precedence to the rear axle began by fitting the rear wheels with 245/40R17 Federal RS-RR Pros — somewhat wider than the 215/40R17 fronts. Then, Richard turned to Elite Performance’s Melody Cannizzaro to soften the sensitive midship’s edges. A little more front camber relative to the rear helped settle the rear end while cornering, and more toe-in at the rear kept it planted under braking and acceleration. Then, as advised by his friends, Richard tried stiffening the front to minimize the nose dive under heavy braking, which could encourage the lightened rear to spin.

Minimizing some of that see-sawing gave him much more confidence in the car, and the resulting improvements in cornering speeds helped Richard notice a few more of its shortcomings.

It wasn’t the tight, direct thing he thought a lightweight MR car would be, but, after all, it was nearing a half-million miles. Sunshine Auto overhauled the entire suspension, adding new control arms, bigger sway bars, inner and outer tie rods, additional chassis bracing, and a set of 808 Racespec coilovers from Bob Pham. “The new setup made the car feel like a go-kart. Actually, the first day back at the track with these mods, I went six seconds faster than I’d ever gone before,” he exclaimed.

Richard’s love for the Sailor Moon series gave this car its eponymous nickname.

“Those modifications transformed it from a decent daily driver to an uncomfortable track car, but I still trust it enough to drive it to the track — it hasn’t left me stranded once,” he said. Pretty impressive for a car that just passed the 500,000 miles on the odometer. Chalk a bit of that up to build quality from the late-eighties Japanese boom, some of that to Richard’s obsessive maintenance habits, and a little bit to the near-stock configuration of the power train.

Aside from a Mishimoto radiator an HKS SSQV BOV, and a Berk 3” exhaust, the original 3SGTE motor remains stock.

Aside from a splitter and a pair of canards, Richard doesn’t plan on adding much more. Actually, he’s confident enough to admit he’s the limiting factor at this stage. “My friends will get in and go six seconds faster than I can, so I know I need seat time more than anything. Well, I could use a set of Sparco Circuits because I’m getting thrown around on the stock seats, but that’s about it.

For me, it’s the perfect track car — dependable, fun, and constantly challenging. I don’t really care about making it the fastest car here. I’ve got a ways to go as a driver, anyways. I’m not here to be the best — I just want to have fun, and in that department, the MR2 always delivers.

My track friends’ words of encouragement and support have been a driving force behind my journey; pushing me to overcome obstacles and strive for greatness. I rolled my car once many years ago and I was in the hospital for months. I thought I wouldn’t walk again.

My wife did not want to see me in another accident ever again. Actually, she wanted me to retire, but she saw how happy I was attending track days with friends, so she now watches me track. I promised her I’ll never go completely flat-out ever again and I’m fine with that — as long as I get to see her smile.”

Special thanks to Elite Performance, The Driveway, and Sunshine Auto.

Michael’s 350Z: Take A Chance, Prove a Point

Twelve years with an unloved chassis has given Michael “Stubz” Hillo a unique perspective on taking the underdog route. There are other established, well-paved paths with minimal maintenance and certain outcomes, but they don’t offer a maverick a chance to prove a point.

Stubz took it upon himself to take the unloved 350Z and make it into a NASA ST4 race-winner because, well, he hated the idea of conforming. However, before he started his mission, he was after an affordable way to begin drifting. Nowadays, the 350Z is one of the few Japanese sports coupes that offers the sort of value the budget drifters offered back in drifting’s heyday. Even then, it was pretty cheap.

It was more than just an option for the cost-conscious drifter, as Stubz realized. Beyond low overhead, a torquey motor, and a rear-drive layout, the Z has a lot going for it. It’s reasonably stiff, the aerodynamics aren’t terrible, and the aftermarket is decently sized. It might not be as well supported as the E46 M3, but it offers similar power-to-weight figures and the potential to run respectable lap times at a fraction of the price.

The zeal and the commitment to proving the platform came later — at first, it was cheap fun. Beating up on pricier cars was only part of the pleasure; the steering was full of feel and responsive, the motor responded well to modifications, and the rear end put the power down decently.

Some of that luster began to fade when he tried to turn the Z into something more than a midfield car. The budget modifications no longer seemed to be enough, and so he tried experimenting with the high-end brands which only offered limited support for the Z.

After testing Penske and Godspeed coilovers, he settled on MCS two-ways with 18K springs up front and 9K in the rear. The car still lacks some of the compliance he’d like in slower corners, but it works well enough in the fast sections, thanks in part to Epsilon+ aero, that the compromise is acceptable.

The most irritation has stemmed from the car’s flawed braking system. Persistent knockback issues and lousy OEM ABS pushed Stubz into spending hundreds of hours diagnosing and attempting to find a package that would work.

Plenty of thrown wrenches and a thousand curse words later, he found a set of Stoptech Trophy big brakes that did a reasonable job. Because they moved the brake calipers closer to three o’clock, they mitigated some of the knockback resulting from the steering knuckle flexing. The remaining bugbear was the ABS system, which needed to be retrofitted with the Bosch Mk60 kit from Race Harness Technologies.

Though the braking system works decently these days, Stubz isn’t completely satisfied. Trailbraking has improved, but the outright braking performance hasn’t gotten much better. However, some of that has to do with the weight of the vehicle, which has been hard to lose with conventional stripping methods. “You’ve gotta get pretty creative when it comes to putting the car on a diet. I didn’t want to, but I had to buy carbon. Hatch, hood, front bumper, and headlight blanks from Spinnaker Composites have helped, but the car is still heavy.” he explains.

It’s transformed into a reasonably swift car in recent years, even with the diminishing returns from spending big bucks on primo parts. The 3,200-pound Z has an average of 257 horsepower which is pretty well administered thanks to 275-section Toyo RRs and the aforementioned aero. A broad powerband helps make the car less track-sensitive than some, and, anyways, Stubz no longer agonizes over finding the perfect setup. After several years of head scratching, he sees the Z as a dependable, safe, and sturdy car which is easy to run and satisfying to drive. Going for the gold isn’t his aim any longer — he’s happy with what the 350Z’s speed. Any car that can lap Buttonwillow W13CW in 1:54 is more than just fun — it’s seriously fast.

Striving to perfect the car sapped some of his ambition, but it’s also given him a few notable wins, wisdom, and a pragmatic approach that provides him with peace of mind. His lack of zeal might not motivate newcomers to try and beat the odds, but if they read between the lines, they should realize that there’s nothing with the Z as an entry/mid-level car. It might not carry an ambitious driver to the top of the podium, but its golden era-pricing lowers the barrier to entry. It’ll help them get involved faster — and in Stubz’s view, that’s better than sitting on the sidelines and dreaming of victory.

Max’s Spec Racer Ford: Lose The Ego

After Max Gokhman signed for his 2006 Cayman, his dealer insisted that he take the car to the track. “You won’t be able to fully appreciate it if you don’t,” he said. Max was hesitant — the thought of balling up his brand new Porsche terrified him, but, at the same time, he sensed the man knew what he was talking about.

Max continued to mull over the prospect of tracking his new toy, but his dealer was adamant — so much so he offered to pay Max’s entry fee. That was all Max needed to make a decision. The next weekend, he took the Cayman to Infineon Raceway and began a love affair that never tested his patience. No crashes, no major repairs, and a relatively straightforward relationship with his parts suppliers made his first few years in grassroots motorsports a breeze.

Soft Ascent

After becoming the 2014 PCA Autocross Class Champion and multiple podium-sitter in various Southern California time attack series, he sold the 987 and moved into a 2014 981 Cayman. This time, however, he wasn’t as eager to modify the car. He’d come to understand the practical shortcomings of a track-oriented car and felt he might get more from the ownership experience if he was to leave the car mostly stock.

It was around then that one of his track buddies enticed him into wheel-to-wheel racing. This would entail buying a race-only machine. Truth be told, he had considered it for some time, but the thought of wadding up a Porsche racing car turned his stomach. Even getting on track in one would be prohibitively expensive, so he explored the cheaper options available to him.

He could drive a Spec Miata for a reasonable price, but he wanted something a little different. “I was looking for a mid-engined, purpose-built platform, and — and this is subjective — something a little more interesting than a Miata,” he explained.

He loved the idea of running a “spec” car: something that encouraged close competition through mechanical parity. What about something with the same power of a Miata, but in a car which weighs one thousand pounds less? The tried-and-true Spec Racer Ford, a staple of grassroots motorsport for the last fifty years, caught his eye. Mid-engine, open-top, closed-wheel, and very cost-effective; there was a lot to like about this diminutive, bare-bones racer.

Barest Bones

The tube-frame chassis has a 1.6-liter engine from a Ford Focus sitting transverse behind the driver. These sealed engines produce 135 horsepower, and are fairly inexpensive to replace when they go bang — though this rarely happens. The emphasis here is on reliability, low running costs, and complete driving immersion.

When Max first tested the car at Laguna Seca, he was setting competitive times by the end of the day.

The sense of occasion is something that can’t be underestimated with an open-top car like this. Not only is the visibility fantastic, but getting your helmet buffeted by the wind makes driving at seventy feel like a hundred and twenty. The information relayed by the car is detailed and constant; it’s easy to feel a locked tire or growing understeer through the steering, which is remarkably sharp. “Feedback is crystal clear,” he adds.

Sitting in the middle of the chassis and knowing exactly where your front wheels are at all times inspires confidence to get real intimate with other racers when going three-wide into a turn - truly what wheel-to-wheel is about.

Some might suspect that a car this visceral and direct would come with sharp edges. In reality, it is predictable and communicative, and, as it has much more grip than power, it’s quite easy to find its limits. When it does slide, it’s fairly progressive — more so than the Cayman; nearly 300 horsepower would cause a few dicey situations when passing in a late-apex turn. Some of this is due to a compliant suspension setup, and some of it is due to the Hoosier slick made specifically for the SRF. Incidentally, it isn’t the most expensive tire. Low weight and low power help lengthen its lifespan, too.

The sequential transmission by Sadev, standard in third-gen SRFs, is another racecar element that Max learned to appreciate. Unlike an H-pattern, which is lovely for canyon drives but saps attention from racecraft; or a PDK, which is clinically precise yet fragile on cars that were built for the street; the SRF gearbox lets you bang out shifts while bouncing off the rev-limiter with abandon.

Perspective Shift

Max admits that, while the Spec Racer Ford is the more engaging car to drive, he doesn’t have the same sentimental attachment to it as he had to his Cayman. “I save the sweet feelings for my Porsche. This is a tool to help me grow as a racer. I compare the distinction between the two to owning a pet versus owning livestock.”

And with the reasonable running costs, packed fields, low power, and full calendars, he’s looking to become a competitive amateur racer as he gets up to speed on the Spec Racer Ford platform, with the help of his team Accel Racetek.

“Once I got competitive with this hobby, I learned that money spent on coaching would make me a lot faster than aero, suspension, or other bits of kit. To me, some of those seem most like things to flex over. With Perry and Travis of Accel Racetek, I not only know that the car will be ready for the next race no matter what tomfoolery I get up to on track, but that they’ll keep nudging me to be a better driver.”

Ultimately, the moral here is that with racing, as with any other passion, dropping your ego — such as by going from a venerable Porsche to a humble Spec Racer Ford — may prove to be the path to success, paved with smiles.

Sonoma’s Recent Repave Helps Set New Records

Speed SF’s drivers were fortunate to be the first members of the public to experience Sonoma’s new repave — the first in twenty-three years. One of Northern California’s most popular race tracks, Sonoma has been the site of NASCAR, IndyCar, and World Touring Car races over its fifty-five years.

Construction began after Christmas, with ABSL Construction of California milling out over 10,000 tons of asphalt from the track and pit lane, then grinding down the track, repairing old cracks, and laying the new asphalt.

Crack sealing in January.

Construction completed on February 23rd, two weeks before Speed SF was able to experience the new surface for ourselves.

The scenery was verdant, but the repave was far from green at Speed SF’s first full-track event of the season — enabling some of our front-runners to set new records in three of our Speed SF Challenge groups. Even those who hadn’t set new records set personal records. “The track is about three seconds faster than before,” Patrick Chio reported.

S4

In S4, Sean Win-Yepez cut 1.1 seconds off his previous best.

“There is more grip everywhere, but the gains are especially noticeable in T3/3A. There, there was so much grip that my power steering started to cut out!

One observation is that the curbs are not redone, so they now offer relatively less grip than the track itself, whereas before they were essentially about the same as the pavement. So, drivers who didn't use the curbs before will pick up more time than drivers who used them a lot.

My setup has remained pretty similar to last year, and I don’t think I benefited as much in the traction zones as some of the more powerful cars,” he added.

S3

In S3, power helped spread the distance from the previous bests a bit further. Spencer Kimball chopped the previous S3 record, set by him last May, by 2.59 seconds. In the last fifteen months, nothing about his setup has changed aside from some weight reduction. "The new paving really helps with consistency and driver confidence. Thanks to the smoother surface and lack of cracks, you can now take T1 and T2 on proper line instead of diverting your path to avoid surface undulations. I have yet to analyze my data and compare it to my previous run’s, but my lap times were about two seconds faster than my last event at Sonoma in 2023.

Based on my quick and dirty analysis, time was gained in T1, the exit of T6, and the T8/8A esses. One of the coolest features of this totally fresh paving is that my tires looked brand new after the event. Once it's rubbered in, I think we'll be seeing a lot more sub-40 cars at Sonoma,” Spencer predicted. 

S2

In S2, Maxwell Lisovsky was able just to show what his monster E36 is capable of. It has benefited from the most development as of late, but that doesn’t take anything away from his staggering 1:39.3 — a whopping 3.5 seconds faster than his previous best. Now, applying the power cleanly in second-gear corners is almost an afterthought for a sorted track tool wearing slicks.

It seems that, due to gaining something more in the traction zones, the punchier cars have been able to take better advantage of the new grip available. However, even those in the budget cars and the underpowered scalpels will find something to love about the fantastic new surface at Sonoma Raceway. These times bode well for the future, which promises novel challenges for drivers and opportunities to push harder than they ever have before..

To sign up for Sonoma event on June 21st, click here.

.

Speed SF Challenge 2023 RECAP

Speed SF’s committed clan of drivers kept the Challenge season full of excitement this year. The competition was fierce throughout most of the classes, the fields were full, and the number of new course records — nearly a dozen — proved the rapid rate of evolution, both from car and driver.

In S1 and SX, Steve Melson was our standout. His more-is-better approach to track days; running his McLaren 765LT, his Audi R8, and his Mercedes GT S simultaneously, proved he knows how to make the most of his (seat) time.

Unfortunately, his busy schedule prevented him from attending the required number of events to qualify for a podium place, but his occasional appearances were filled with laps thanks to the triple-session approach he’s made his own. Still, even with relatively few appearances this year, Steven was able to set a new S1 record at Laguna as well as a new S2 record at Thunderhill West. We look forward to seeing him next year.

Steven’s McLaren is, without a doubt, the fastest stock car currently in our ranks.

In S2, George Brooks, a newcomer to our series, established himself as a front runner from the start. His potential was clear after winning the second event, and the combination of consistency and his C7 Corvette’s acceleration kept S2000-driving Champion Gary Yeung on his toes. George's early-season pace wasn’t a fluke, either – he proved himself quick at numerous circuits with front-running positions all throughout the season. In fact, George did not miss a single event this year.

His commitment paid off; culminating in a double-points victory at the season finale at Laguna. Though George’s effort could not beat Gary’s outright pace in 2023, we have no doubt George will give Gary and the rest of the S2 contenders hell this year.

A simple Corvette and good support helped Thomas find his potential quickly.

Newcomer Thomas DiGioacchino rounded out the podium. His C5 Corvette and his driving improved considerably over the course of the season, and his five podiums stand as testament to the fact that, even with relatively little experience, putting yourself in good hands can help you hone your craft quickly.

On top of the regulars, there were four reclusive geniuses making up the ranks this year — each of their one-off wins kept everyone guessing. Seigo Ma (S2000), Steve Melson (Mercedes GT S), Kai Anderson (Camaro ZL1), and Tailai Lihe (Supra) might not’ve been in attendance every weekend, but they didn’t need to be to stand at the top of the podium.

In S3, we saw the closest title battle among any of our classes. It was Spencer Kimball and his well developed E92 M3 who eventually took the crown, but Legend Brandenburg in his modestly tuned Supra kept most of us guessing. The title wasn’t decided until the season finale — where the difference between these two was a mere eight points. Legend took the win that day, but it wasn’t enough to offset Spencer’s dominant performance from February to December.

Spencer’s M3 has had all its issues addressed and now puts in remarkable times consistently.

Tailing closely behind, mainstay Joe McGuigan in his recently sorted IS-F made the last step of the podium, and, it should be said, kept Legend and Spencer honest throughout the season. Also worth a tip of the hat was Ken Cemo, who attended every event and drove his Camaro exceptionally well. His upbeat attitude and commitment slate him as a future podium finisher.

Sean’s tidy driving made him the dominant driver in S4.

The S4 field was by far the largest, with thirty-three competitors and a close battle between S2000s at the top three steps. Sean Win-Yepez followed the wise words of Aki at Blacktrax and kept his S2000 simple and the changes minimal. Additionally, Sean started running double sessions to maximize seat time. This allowed him to run most of his best laps in the Gold Open Passing group, which reduced the pressure and made it easier to set a hot lap. With seven wins and eight new lap records at the end of the season, Sean’s holistic approach had clearly paid off.

While Sean set the S4 standard this season, it was wildman Nate Hackman in his milder S2000 sliding close behind and providing the entertainment. His flamboyant driving style was not merely exhilarating to watch, it was seriously fast; his bests often just marginally behind Sean. Maybe Nate will max out his allotted points in 2024 and give Sean an even tougher time.

David Haro snuck in a solitary win — another gold for the S2000 clan. We anticipate the other S4 contenders — Scott Smith (987 Cayman) and Patrick Chio (E46 M3), winner of the S3 season finale — nipping at Sean and Nate’s heels throughout the coming season.

Patrick (M3) added a passenger seat in order to run in S4 for the final event and showed most of the class his heels.

In S5, the two heavy hitters in the lightest cars traded positions all season. In addition to setting a slew of records at Thunderhill, Tyler Packard took his RX-8 to the title, but that was not certain until the final few rounds. S5 is anyone’s game as long as they show up frequently, as Patryck Sworonski (NA Miata) proved with an equally impressive series of wins and seconds. In the end, Tyler attended one more event than Patryck, and that made all the difference.

We hope to see both new and familiar faces ready at Laguna Seca on February 18th, where this year’s Challenge will officially begin.

On a technical note, our Competition Director Scott Smith has made a few modifications to both base and modification points to further converge on competition parity.

To view our class calculator for the 2024 season, please follow this link.

Passing Etiquette: Making Space and Saving Face

Photos (unless specified otherwise): Trevor Ryan

Overtaking is a tricky business, and learning how to pass decisively and safely takes time and practice. It pays to err on the side of caution — especially with unknown drivers. After all, squabbling for position isn’t the most judicious thing to do when there’s no prize on the line. Nobody wins a track day.

As a general rule in racing, the overtaker must present themselves alongside the driver in front — typically with the overtaking driver’s front wheels ahead of the overtaken driver’s rears before the turn-in point. This way, they’re able to see the other driver through their peripheral vision. Studying one’s surroundings and knowing where other cars are at all times is necessary to become a capable track driver.

It pays to be seen. Credit: CC-by-2.0/MIDWST.BLUR

Of course, this is a rule followed in wheel-to-wheel racing. With Speed SF, the passing car must have its front wheels in-line with the passed car’s front wheel before the beginning of the braking zone if they want to attempt a pass. It’s worth giving everyone a little more room since nobody can truly win at a track day, after all.

Our aim is to give all our drivers their own space and help the faster drivers safely navigate the slower traffic so nobody gets held up.

To give assertive advanced drivers the leeway to pass freely while allowing novices time and safety to ease their way into it, we have outlined some hard and fast rules for our various run groups. For those groups with stricter passing rules, like Green and Blue, the process of passing is made as simple as possible.

Novice Group (Green)

Responsible novices dedicate most of their mental energy to driving their own car, so they likely lack the bandwidth to watch their mirrors while driving. For this reason, we only allow passing on the designated straightaways — never through the middle of a corner — to simplify the mental burden. The courteous driver being passed should lift off the throttle to make life easier for the passing driver. This really helps when overtaking in a Miata.

When the driver being passed decides to lift off their throttle, they give the passing driver more room to complete this overtake prior to the braking zone, which is our second requirement. The passing driver should not be pressured into squeezing themselves down the inside at the turn-in point. Just because someone, especially a novice, gives the point by does not mean that a pass is possible; the passing driver must carefully judge whether it is going to work. If it’s doubtful the pass can’t work, back off — nobody wins a track day.

Keep an eye out for that point-by. Credit: OpenTrack

Generally speaking, we like the driver being passed to allow the passing driver to rejoin the conventional driving line before turning in. If they insist on turning into the corner from an inside line (ie. a line closer to the apex than the standard line), they must navigate a shorter radius and therefore reduce their entry speeds accordingly.

Because the novice’s situational awareness isn’t as great as a regular who instinctively checks their mirrors, we require the passing driver to wait for a specific gesture from the driver ahead. By leaning their left hand out the window (or right in a RHD car) and pointing at the portion of the track they’d prefer the overtaking driver to use while passing, they give a sign of recognition and avoid confusion. Wait for a clear signal, and preferably before a longish straightaway — it’s safest and easiest to pass there.

Intermediate Group (Blue)

Even with their experience, we want members of blue group to follow the same passing rules as the members of green.

HARD RULES: GREEN/BLUE

Point-by passing is required at all times. Under no circumstances is passing in the corners allowed, and passes along the straights must be completed before the braking zone.

Point-by Recommended/Mixed Group (Yellow):

After a dozen days or so, driving alongside others at a quick pace is no longer terrifying like it once was. We try to encourage these drivers to be assertive with their car placement so as to begin the two-part process of an advanced pass. Both parties must be aware of one another, and as long as there’s enough room to overtake safely, we allow passing without a hand signal. Though a point-by is still recommended to make sure everyone is aware, it isn’t required.

There are other ways to communicate reaching an arm outside the window. For instance, the driver being passed taps their rear-view mirror prior to the turn-in point (a common acknowledgement). This indicates that the driver attempting the pass is seen and will give way. The driver ahead can also offer a corner without signaling by slowing than necessary before turn-in, usually off the ideal line. If the driver behind sees the “door opening” and the driver ahead taking an odd line slowly into the corner, they will know they’ve been given a chance to pass.

When overtaking and turning in on a tighter line, remember more braking pressure (if braking is necessary) is likely required.

HARD RULES: YELLOW

The fundamental skill required to run in this group is strong situational awareness. Drivers are allowed to pass anywhere, but only at a moderate pace. Point-by passing is recommended, but not required. Exercise caution and make sure to read the driver ahead before attempting a pass.

Open Passing Group (Red + Gold):

Highly experienced drivers aren’t protected by such rules, which means they need to read the subtler signs of a driver giving way, learn how to pass decisively, and how to present themselves so as to be seen.

To run successfully in the Open Passing Group, you must know how to improvise with car placement while keeping the general level of grip in mind. Even while driving through a corner side by side, both drivers must be able to react and, hopefully, anticipate the other’s move.

Limited visibility and reduced grip make overtaking in the rain even more challenging. Remain patient and, due to the tricky conditions, avoid forcing the issue.

Of course, open passing doesn’t mean fighting for position like it would in a true race setting, but the increased level of competition typical in this run group

Assuming both parties can recognize each other’s position on track and drive in harmony, these sorts of overtakes can be done safely. They do, however, require a good deal of spatial awareness, decisiveness, car control, and forethought. For that reason, we only allow drivers with over twenty track days under their belt (or those holding a racing license) to join this group.

HARD RULES: RED/GOLD

Twenty-plus track days or racing license needed to partake. Must be experienced with open passing. No passing restrictions as long as drivers exercise good judgment.

Final Thoughts

Cooperation is the name of the game, so try to wait until a definite sign is given before attempting a pass. Make sure there’s adequate grip available to take a tighter line than the conventional line if that’s what the situation requires. The tighter the line, the more deceleration prior to the corner is required. Trailbraking helps here.

If a train of cars ahead makes life difficult for a faster driver bringing up the rear, they’re advised to pit momentarily to establish a gap. This makes life much easier and offers a better chance of achieving a personal best.

When deciding whether or not to attempt an overtake, remember that the passing car is always responsible for ensuring a safe pass. Even if the car ahead closes the door on the driver behind, it’s the latter’s fault. Leave a little space whenever possible and never squeeze somebody on a track day.

Keep eyes up at all times, scan the environment for faster and slower cars both and behind, and try not to fixate too much on rolling speed into the corner during an overtake. Instead, prioritize a strong exit. Well, the beginners should try to do this to avoid sliding off when overtaking on the inside. The experienced drivers know that, in racing, sometimes getting ahead of the driver in front is all that’s needed; an overtaken driver can’t always respond if the overtaking driver exits the corner slowly. Again, that’s racing, and this is track day driving, where the objective is to bring the car home in one piece.

Lastly, remember that there’s nothing to win here. Track days exist to help people gain experience running independently, so giving way to a faster driver when they’ve demonstrated superior speed is a mark of maturity. Yes, it might sting, particularly if they’re in a much slower car, but leave some room for humility and open the door — following a faster driver closely can be the best sort of instruction anyone can get.

Hubert's MKIV Supra: Soft Spot

Like Ken Yu, Hubert Chan first got a taste of speed on two wheels. His motorcycling antics with his cousin Wil sowed the seed, but it wasn’t until one of Wil’s dearest friends gave Hubert a taste of acceleration that made even a 600cc bike feel a little lackluster. The stoplight-to-stoplight sprints in Phil’s modified fourth-generation Supra Turbo had Hubert hooked. “It just never stopped pulling,” he said.

However, Hubert wasn’t pushed in the direction of drag racing — he had an affinity for corner carving. An E30 M3 seemed to him the coolest cornering machine in his price range, but he struggled to find the right one. Eventually, he decided another platform might be more accessible, so he gave the big Supra a chance. This was 2013, back when both these iconic cars cost half of what they do today.

The Supra had left an indelible mark on him, and though not many had taken them to the track, his knowledgeable friends signed off on the Supra as a worthwhile sports car. When Hubert found the online listing for a clean, reasonably priced, and unmodified 1994 Turbo, he bought a one-way ticket to Salt Lake City and drove it back to the Bay, dreaming of future modifications the entire way.

The Supra Turbo had proven itself as a stellar road tripper; comfortable, quiet, and still torquey enough to pass anybody quite easily. However, it was a little on the boaty side, and Hubert sought out a few ways to improve the footwork.

First came a set of Fortune Auto 500 coilovers, and the resulting agility proved that the car was more versatile than its reputation had led him to believe. The Supra’s long wheelbase didn’t feel like an encumbrance on tighter backroads, and the way it sat securely over bumps and cambers made it quite confidence-inspiring.

The foundation was there for more power, which Hubert always knew would be the most exhilarating part of tuning this new toy of his. The promise of easy horsepower encouraged him to amass a large collection of engine parts over the course of the first year. By the time he’d had it for twelve months, he was ready to move onto the second chapter and double the power output.

With the help of mechanically-inclined friend, they pulled the factory turbochargers and replaced them with a log-style cast manifold and a Precision 6266 turbocharger, then fitted Kelford 264° cams and a full 3” Tanabe Medallion Exhaust. With some meth injection and a safe tune of the AEM V2 from Lawrence Shipman, the motor made a healthy 580 horsepower on 91 octane.

With the way the Powerhouse Racing turbo kit emphasized low-end torque, it became challenging to turn that into propulsion. To address the wheelspin issues, he followed the forum recommendation to replace the factory torsen with a TRD 1.5-way differential and increase the rear tire size to 295s, which he was able to do via widening the factory rear wheels.

For the final touches to the footwork, Hubert had consulted the Supra community for an appropriate sports alignment, but upon taking it to Elite to have it aligned, Melody Cannizzaro suggested a few alterations to his provided specs. With additional toe-in at the rear, the Supra felt reassuring and stable; enough so that Hubert was comfy stepping on the throttle in second and third gear. No longer was he hindered by the big torque, which gives relatively little warning before it hits.

The Supra had established itself a capable cruiser and a competent canyon car, but Hubert was most interested in seeing what it was like in an environment where he could really stretch its legs. It wasn’t long after that his friend Janning encouraged he take the Supra to Laguna, where he met his friend Samson, another track driver who’s been instrumental in getting Hubert up to speed.

After a few spins and some big slides, Hubert began to get a sense of just how much of the power he could use in Turns 2 and 11. The power must be applied gently in the slower corners, but it will put the power down in third, assuming the car is mostly straight. “The car was definitely driving me that day, but I didn’t care. I was addicted!” he exclaimed.

Over the next few events, Hubert began addressing the handling problems only apparent after a few fast laps. It was still a little too floppy from factory; the annoying targa top would flex to the point of requiring readjustment after every session.

Hubert parked beside his friend and mentor Samson’s M3.

Titan Motorsports’ four-point rollbar, reduced the flex and the need to fiddle on the targa between outings. Still, it remained too soft to transition crisply, so Hubert installed a set of SuperPro polyurethane bushings at the critical points in the suspension, Titan anti-roll bars, and a TRD strut bar. It’s tauter than it’s ever been, but it’s still a little on the comfier side. As a car which sees more street duty than track action currently he’s content with the setup.

Its ability to cruise to and from the track in total comfort isn’t something he’s willing to forgo in the name of going faster quite yet. The power is more than adequate, the car is controllable, and the engine doesn’t show any signs of stress. Essentially, it’s barely breaking a sweat with such limited lapping.

“I’m happy with the Supra in its current state for now, but once I get a little more comfortable pushing it, I might improve the brakes and the suspension.

It’s just an easy car to live with, and I’m afraid of ruining that. Plus, it gets so much attention in the pits. Some people ask me why I risk driving such a rare car, but I think it’d be wrong to keep it in a garage. Most people think it’s only good for drag racing, but the Supra is a great performance car — it’s very much at home on the track.”